Chen Chunhua issued a statement that this traffic carnival should be at the end

Source | Mantis Observation

Wen | Chen Haoran

This summer, due to more than 10,000 exaggerations on the Internet, interpretation of Chen Chunhua's interpretation, comments and repeated hype articles on Huawei, dragging Huawei and Chen Chunhua into the vortex of public opinion.

On July 6, Huawei issued a public statement, more like dripping water in the oil pan, which caused a lot of discussions and rushing to hot search. Public opinion vortex became bigger and bigger. Subsequently, Chen Chunhua also briefly explained this. But public opinion is still more than that, even "Peking University" is involved.

On August 3, Chen Chunhua posted an open letter in his public account- "Chen Chunhua: An Open Letter", facing the three major issues of the public opinion center, and showing more details. I believe that this "network farce" and "traffic carnival" have reached the ending stage.

What is the statement say

The best way to leave the vortex is to go to the center of the vortex, although this is not easy.

Regardless of the previous statement of Huawei and Chen Chunhua, or this time Chen Chunhua sent an open letter, it is essentially based on this. Throughout the incident, there are three keywords -Huawei incident, education, and Professor Peking University. Around these three points, in the public letter, Chen Chunhua made all explanations, and let's take a look at what he said.

One is the "Huawei Incident". As the analysis of many articles, it is the "pirated institution" behind the biggest profitability behind it. The tip of the iceberg that is not truthfully promoted the hype. Before that, the undercurrent had already surged.

Through the open letter, we also saw a scholar's difficulty in fighting for rights -public letters pointed out that as early as in late June 2021, Chen Chunhua had already linked to the publisher to entrust a lawyer to sue pirated book vendors operating on the relevant platforms and follow the lawyer according to the lawyer. The request was not announced first, and the case was filed in the court on September 23, 2021. The case is still being promoted.

Chen Chunhua, who picked up the legal weapon, announced the results of the fake fake when he was in the trial, and made the truth, but the "vortex" of public opinion came first -not easy to defend rights. However, Chen Chunhua said that "it will still persist."

The second is the "explanation of a doctoral degree". This is another problem that the public cares. Chen Chunhua's academic qualifications are indeed a doctoral degree-it can be seen from the open letter that after studying in 1999-2001, Chen Chunhua completed nearly 100,000 words The paper, who was appraised by the defense committee composed of seven bloggers and professors, and finally obtained a doctorate degree.

However, there is a policy change in the middle, that is, in February 2003, the "Regulations on Sino -foreign Cooperation Schools" was introduced and implemented in September of the same year. According to the new regulations, Chen Chunhua's doctoral degree has not been recognized in China. However, it can be seen that Chen Chunhua's time for a doctorate degree was before the new regulations were promulgated. In other words, when Chen Chunhua obtained a doctorate degree, it was recognized, and his degree is a PhD. This is not a good dispute.

The third is the "explanation of Peking University's employment process". The details of the open letter show that on the one hand, when Chen Chunhua hired Chen Chunhua, she was clear about her academic qualifications, and specifically asked and discussed her doctorate degree issue, and after careful discussion. The Peking University National Development Council attaches more attention to management research value and practical experience, so it has passed the introduction decision and the employment process is in line with procedures.

On the other hand, in Peking University's humanity system, Chen's degree authentication material is a master's degree in Singapore National University. There is no saying that it is superior to a doctoral degree.

At the end of the public letter, Chen Chunhua said that after careful consideration, Chen Chunhua made a decision, and he would always adhere to his position -respect to practice and keep confidence in theory.

Why take the initiative to leave Peking University?

Chen Chunhua's decision did not say in the open letter, and she decided to "take the initiative to leave Peking University." On the same day, a statement issued by the Personnel Department of Peking University showed that "the application for receiving the resignation of Mr. Chen Chunhua" was terminated and the contract was terminated in accordance with the procedure.

It is not placed in the public letter. On the one hand, this matter has nothing to do with the content of the public letter to explain. content.

The logic behind it is actually understandable.

First, from a personal point of view, Chen Chunhua does not want to continue to see with the public opinion, and it will not be right to rely on public opinion. Instead, it will involve more energy and unnecessary trouble. In fact, whether it is Huawei or Peking University, it is regarded by pirated institutions as a ladder of "making gods" by Chen Chunhua. In this case, Chen Chunhua's active division has made these ladders "no longer exist", which is also "salary and boiling".

The second is to take the initiative to resign, both of which are stop loss for Peking University and Chen Chunhua. From the details in the public letter, it can be seen that Chen Chunhua loves and cherishes the research work he is engaged in, and feels that the unique degree, eclectic, and compatible knowledge of people insist on the concept of people who insist on Peking University. Choosing to take the initiative to resign, it is also a very responsible choice to help Peking University, that is, letting your own public opinion storm, and personal responsibility.

It turns out that Chen Chunhua's choice is undoubtedly wise.

Just today, there are two entries on Weibo hot search, the so -called "Peking University termination of Chen Chunhua's employment contract" and "Chen Chunhua's recognition of doctoral degrees is not certified". Look at its front cause and consequences -before the "Peking University termination of Chen Chunhua's employment contract", there is actually a "application for receiving Chen Chunhua's resignation"; "Chen Chunhua's recognition of the doctoral degree was not certified", and there was a "February 2003 ' The Regulations of Sino -foreign Cooperation Schools ''. So netizens who do not know the truth and ask for cause and effect may be another wave of public opinion. Hot search entries, "fast food" products in the era of network information, really do not know whether it is progress or a kind of sorrow. But anyway, this traffic carnival should be terminated after that, although the person who is deeply trapped may be affected again.

Leaving Peking University, is Chen Chunhua OK in the future?

So for Chen Chunhua, will she not work after leaving Peking University and experience the vortex of public opinion? The answer is not.

On the one hand, it can be seen from the details of the statement that Chen Chunhua did not become "valuable" because he went to Peking University, but because "valuable" was invited by Peking University to join.

Before being hired by Peking University, Chen Chunhua was a well -known scholar in May 2000, a professor of hiring in South China Polytechnic. Prior to this, Chen Chunhua also served as the chairman and CEO of Xinxiu Liuhe Co., Ltd., who was a real corporate executive and manager, and received an invitation.

This also means that entering Peking University is of course a good thing for Chen Chunhua, but it is only icing on the cake. Its value as a scholar and manager has long been confirmed. When he was trapped in the vortex of public opinion, some insiders pointed out that Chen Chunhua is an industry leader level, and the industry has a high degree of recognition of it.

On the other hand, behind the hype of pirated institutions, there are also Chen Chunhua's books "valuable". We know that the ultimate goal of pirated book vendors is to make profits. For the greatest profit, these people usually choose market books for illegal piracy, because this is the highest "efficiency". This is the same as the hottest and hottest movie piracy is always the same as the previous pirated DVD, and the more popular works, the probability and strength of the piracy are the greatest because there is market value.

In addition, Chen Chunhua's statement faced various problems and showed various details. It was also a very courageous behavior. In fact, there are many choices of Chen Chunhua. Many personal details may not be taken away for everyone. The reason why this choice can also be seen. As a scholar and manager who once served as a corporate executive, Chen Chunhua will be broken in the event of an incident. Broken, very decisive.

Perhaps this is another "broken cocoon" for her.

In general, leaving the "golden signboard" of Peking University, for Chen Chunhua, it also separated from the university system, and therefore reduced some restraints. After leaving Peking University, Chen Chunhua can also develop more. Research mode and direction.

In addition, after leaving Peking University, Chen Chunhua's personal value will not "reduce points" -because this does not affect her is a scholar who has academic achievements and has been a joint director in the new hope. From theoretical knowledge to actual combat experience, Chen Chunhua still occupies a very high academic and practical position in the minds of corporate managers. From this perspective, it may not be bad.

Conclusion

Judging from the development of this incident, in addition to the pirated book vendors behind the scenes, this time the "protagonist on the bright side" is the victims. Chen Chunhua's personal reputation has been questioned by many unknown people. Peking University and Huawei are also inexplicable. I rolled into the vortex of public opinion that had nothing to do with them.

With Chen Chunhua's comprehensive explanation of the incident, it will also paint a "rest symbol" for this inexplicable traffic carnival.

*The pictures of this article are from the Internet

- END -