Self -cultivation of "digital citizen": do something, do nothing

At present, many parents share their children's photos in their online social circles and record their children's daily life, but ignore the privacy leaks that the behavior of "sunboy" may bring. In "Daiwa please think twice: Child Privacy Protection in the Data Age", the author Lia Princott analyzes the impact of "excessive exposure" on children and the hidden future risks for the "sunboy" line. In addition, as a legal scholar, Pronko also pointed out the shortcomings of platform policies, legal responsibilities, and social institutions in the book, and put forward targeted improvements.

■ Sebei

In the digital age, children of the "post -00s" can basically be called "digital citizens", and "digital files" will accompany them in their lives to record their old, sick, sick, moody and sorrow. "Archives" may be held by parents, teachers, relatives, friends, and even neighbors. Among them, parents occupy an important position.

In "Daiwa please think twice: Child Privacy Protection in the Data Age" (Shanghai People's Publishing House, May 2022), the author Lia Pulangkott used the line of "sunboy" to analyze "excessive exposure" to children to children The influence and hidden future risks. In addition, as a legal scholar, Pronko also pointed out the shortcomings of platform policies, legal responsibilities, and social institutions in the book, and put forward targeted improvements.

The distortion and expectations under "excessive exposure"

The birth of the word "sun" is accompanied by the prevalence of social networks. We use it to record life, share joy and sorrow, get in touch with the old friends, and make strangers ... In psychology, this is a self -revealing in a virtual space. It gives a great attention or sense of attention, but the sense of boundaries and privacy gradually weakened. In the past, people pursued applause and flowers, and now pursue like and collection.

If the "sun" of adults actively shared their lives, for children who were "sun -sun", their footprints and records were created by their parents in their social circles. It is worth noting that the younger children, the easier their privacy is to be ignored.

We will temporarily divide "sunbathing" into two categories: commerciality and simply record growth. Commercial sunbathing is generally to create a marketing account, which achieves profitability through traffic or advertising. The interpretation generally has a fixed script. However, last year, the state issued relevant policies to prohibit profit from "Internet celebrity children" and take measures such as bannings for over -consumption "net red children". Therefore, the discussion here is a "sunboy" that is ignored by the public.

The child speaks for the first time and walks for the first time; the child is carrying a small schoolbag to school; the child's dance class dances to check in; the child makes you angry, but he lowered his head to admit the mistakes ... These are the "records" that many parents think are often.

The book introduces the hidden dangers of the "sunboy" from four aspects and the possible impact on the future: the hidden dangers of crime, the non -illegal but offending activities, the personal reputation, and the use of interpersonal communication, and the use of children's privacy to obtain commercial interests.

First of all, it is the most obvious. Parents may not realize that taking the child's school road and school gate may be noticed by the people. Through excavation and information on the social media of parents, illegal people can accurately understand the child's get out of class time, which way to go, and may even know whether there are people at the family at this moment. Secondly, there are some issues that are likely to be unimaginable. For example, the current face -changing technology can already replace the child's face on the photo of the circle of friends to the adult restriction video. What makes parents unexpected is that the impact of "sunbathing" on children's interpersonal relationships and self -awareness. The information shared by parents may become the "black history" that is still ridiculed by others many years later.

Most parents do not know these risks specifically, then the question comes. If these problems are written in the "user notification", will the parents re -examine or filter the content of the "baby"?

Is the equivalent exchanges helpless?

Digital Citizen Education Research Scholar Mike Rubu believes in the book "Digital Citizen Education in Schools" that "digital citizens should use digital technology while they can abide by norms and be responsible for their actions." The law stipulates that "the same number of slander information has reached more than 500 times, which constitutes a crime of defamation and needs to be criminally responsible." We understand the norms and responsibilities of a "digital citizen", but when the perspective is converted to technical suppliers and Internet marketing institutions, for various reasons, the definition of responsibility and use specifications cannot be effectively regulated and restrained.

Lia Pronko pointed out in the book that such a "trap": When you interact with digital technology and related big data, a typical feature is that you will get benefits immediately. This "benefit" may be psychological level, material level, or simple convenience.

We often encounter this situation. Some people walk along the street with the QR code. As long as you scan, you can get a balloon or a key chain. Or give away gifts; the child participated in a game, requiring the authorized personal information to log in to the voting website for the accuracy and fairness of the results ... Do you want to agree?

We have all seen the "consent" when using the software, and the matters listed by the consent of the technical service provider are checked, and the reality is that if you do not check, you will not be able to use the software. So, between gently sweeping and consent, your relevant information may have been stolen. And how much information is "steal" and what we use for, we never know. "People use information in a few unclear ways and provide security guarantees for digital life through these private information." Although they are "equivalent exchanges", they are more helpless. Although the author said, "One of the major features of this book is that there are many questions and less answers given", from the perspective of the current situation, only more people realize this problem can the answer gradually find out.

In the era of digital wrapped in information, we are re -learning social and privacy, sharing and connection. Just as after digital technology records everything, we should also try to "forget" it. In response to this, Lia Pronko also mentioned some suggestions in the book, such as retaining the rights of the public and children to delete data after adulthood, or "providing self -forgotten options" and "automatic destruction settings". In daily life, Pronkot also suggested that parents establish a real connection with the surrounding area, not just relying on the Internet to obtain support and information.

"Danwa please think twice: Children's Privacy Protection in Data Age" is not blindly spreading "technical panic". The author affirmed the positive significance of social media in the book, but reminded us to see the costs and hidden dangers behind it. "Parents' love sons are profound." Don't despise the meaning of information, cherish the child's digital capital, and respect the privacy of children. What we must do when we "sun" is: do something, do not do something.

- END -