The contemporary response and development of "the dispute between poetry and philosophy"

Source: "Chinese Social Sciences Digest" 2022, No. 7 P59 -P60

Author: Tan Haozhe Xu Siyu Unit: Shandong University Literature and Aesthetic Research Center, from "Hebei Academic Journal" 2022, No. 1, Xiang Jiangtao

In "Re -Turking for Compulsory Interpretation", Zhang Jiang proposed: "Literature is non -cognitive, and its value lies in the creation of ambiguity; the perception of literature is in the end, and the other categories, including history and philosophy, are cognitive. The value is to eliminate unlikely. Its sense of perception is understanding, and what is finally sought for consensus. "This differential discussion about" literature "and" other doors "can be used as the starting point and end point of Zhang Jiang's" compulsory interpretation theory "series of views - Literature is different from other categories, and the understanding and interpretation of literature have their own way. From "Mandatory Interpretation Theory" to "Re -Essay Interpretation", Zhang Jiang's entire theoretical development can be divided into three stages. In the process of these three stages, the response and and. Development has gradually begun.

"Determination" of literary interpretation

In 2014, Zhang Jiang put forward the concept of "compulsory interpretation" on the series of Western literature theory in the 20th century, and opened an interpretation research on the construction of Chinese contemporary literary theory. The so -called "compulsory interpretation" refers to the interpretation of "deviating from text discourse, eliminating literary indications, and previous stances and patterns to interpret the subjective intentions and conclusions of text and literature." The core of the mandatory interpretation theory is to criticize Western literature theory and criticize the ontology characteristics of literary theory and criticism in a non -literary manner. To restore this feature, Zhang Jiang proposed the "ontology interpretation theory" from the text accordingly.

The entanglement of literature and other disciplines is not the first time in the development of Western discipline theory. This issue is reflected in the dispute between "poetry" and "philosophy" in Western cultural traditions. At the beginning of the "Poetry Controversy", it was the most truthful and better object of the poetic thinking of Homer's tradition and the philosophical thinking brought by Socrates. With the development of natural science in modern times, the scientific thinking of philosophy has begun to occupy the spiritual field of poetry. In this case, a group of poetic explanatory defenders have appeared. The focus of "the dispute between poetry and philosophy" has shifted to emphasize the method of grasping the world and truth from the world and the truth. Poetry has its own "scientificity" Essence

The defense of poetic interpretation is a series of inseparable issues. This series of issues can be called a poetic interpretation of the "certain issue". Zhang Jiang started with compulsory interpretation. While reconstructing literary theory and criticism, he also responded from the perspective of literary interpretation.

Affirming the nature of literature is different from other disciplines, and it is also the prerequisite for Zhang Jiang's criticism for compulsory interpretation. In the "Re -Turking for Compulsory Interpretation", Zhang Jiang further clarified the difference between the "experience" and "cognition" of the two to achieve the difference between "resonance" and "consensus". These distinctions are eventually pointing to literary interpretation to return to "literature." This involves the second and third issues, that is, the certainty of literary interpretation objects and the certainty of literary interpretation paths.

Zhang Jiang's "theory of ontology interpretation" emphasizes the return of the text itself. He believes that the text is free. "The freedom of the text refers to the meaning of the text itself." He divided the ontology interpretation into three levels from inside and outside: core interpretation, origin interpretation, and effect interpretation. The three levels together constitute all the possibilities of literary interpretation, but the foothold and foothold are in text.

Literary interpretation of the correct line is from text practice, not from theory. Because starting directly from the theoretical position of the advanced theory is to force the effect interpretation to the core interpretation, and because the result of the literary interpretation is not the only "truth", it is also impossible to fake. Correct, relying on the extensive and vivid signs of literature, enhance the persuasiveness and influence of stance ".

What is related to the interpretation object and the path of interpretation is the boundary issue of literary interpretation. Zhang Jiang pointed out that literary interpretation has a boundary, because "the meaning of the text is limited and cannot explain the limited meaning of the text. As the creation of the author, the author's subjective intention and expression are equally limited, and you cannot do limited intentions and expression. Infinite play. He analyzed the "original meaning interpretation" and "theoretical interpretation": the former used the original meaning of the text, and the purpose of seeking the right or wrong in the context at the time; the latter was supported by life, passion, intuition, and accidentality.

The "rational" factor of literary interpretation

Zhang Jiang set out the first boundary from the "text" and "interpretation path", and set the infinite limit of literary interpretation in the interpretation of the body theory. Righteousness for its "qualitative", under this boundary, literary interpretation is still unlimited. This non -fixed infinite interpretation also extended another problem, that is, unknown, can literary and artistic interpretation based on spirit, life and even passion can be universally recognized?

In terms of the identity of literary interpretation, Zhang Jiang emphasized the role of rationality. He proposed the concept of "public rationality" and "public interpretation". Public rationality "is the consensus overlap and standardization of individual rationality. The basic field of understanding and expression "can only be publicly explained in the perspective of public rationality. From the perspective of literary interpretation, all individual interpretations around the text want to be accepted by the public and become a public interpretation, which must be tested by public rationality. Public rationality is not constant. The proposal of "public rationality" not only solves the publicity of literary interpretation, but also draws a second boundary for literary interpretation. Whether it is the choice of the object or the generation of the path, it is not difficult to see the rational role in the interpretation theory of the ontology. Classical interpretation of scattered procedures must not restore order under the action of irrational factors.

Circular theory is Zhang Jiang's criticism of the arguments and judgments in Western literature theory, but under the redefinition of the whole, the circular argument has been given a new understanding and significance. Explanation must be included in consideration. The overall and part of the text that promote and demonstrate each other in interpretation, Zhang Jiang calls "the cycle inside the text". He pointed out that there is still a "large cycle of overall" in the cycle demonstration, which cross out the category of specific texts, involving the three factors of historical tradition, the current context, and interpretation of the subject. In interaction, promotion and cycle interpretation, new interpretations are constantly formed, and through public rational testing, it has become an effective interpretation of general recognition. The "small cycle" and "large cycle" in literary interpretation are the pursuit of the overall meaning of the text.

Psychological perspective of literary interpretation

Zhang Jiang pointed out that Dilai, Heidegger, Gadamer, etc. still focus on functional discussions, define interpretations in the interpretation method, and most of them are metaphysical assumptions and deductions. He regards psychology as a perspective, re -examines the interpretation behavior, and combines literary interpretation to conduct a psychological construction of literary interpretation. This not only opens up a new horizon of literary interpretation, but also further is further rich in literary interpretation theory. "Poetry" defense.

Zhang Jiang also re -examined the essence of interpretation, interpretation of interpretation, and interpretation from a psychological perspective. Starting from the perspective of psychology, he defines the essence of interpretation as a "self -evidence" behavior. Zhang Jiang discussed the consistency of interpretation and self -evidence from the relationship between the ontology, understanding and interpretation of the interpretation of the subject theory, and the function of interpretation. The origin of the origin has been clearer. In "Public Interpretation Theory", Zhang Jiang pointed out the constructive role of public interpretation, but did not further question how public interpretation was to improve the public rationality. , Even some individuals explain to public rationality by constructing self -drawing and others.

In the "Re -True Covenant Interpretation", Zhang Jiang used psychological "expectations" and "motivation" to once again clearly explained the position issues, and proposed that the critical interpretation criticized was a kind of "previous grasp" instead of "prevalence". In the interpretation, once the motivation is established, all the interpretations of the subject will achieve the motivation goal, that is, the intention of the discussion, and ignore the original meaning of the text, rejection of disadvantaged materials, and conduct non -logical arguments to create false correlations. These are the criticisms of Zhang Jiang in the theory of compulsory interpretation. Therefore, Zhang Jiang said that "forced interpretation is a motivation interpretation."

Regarding the results of literary interpretation and the interpretation of natural sciences, Zhang Jiang used "resonance" and "consensus" to distinguish.

The two -way echo of "compulsory interpretation theory" and "the dispute between poetry and philosophy"

In the early and late stages of his theoretical development, Zhang Jiang discussed the problem of mandatory interpretation of Western literary theory from the aspects of philosophy and psychology. In the early stage, the mandatory interpretation was influenced by the philosophy of arbitrary theory; in the later period, it was driven by the self -evidence of the self -evidence behind the psychological level. Looking at the history of western cultural development, forced interpretation is actually the contemporary presentation of the ancient propositions of the Western "poetry and philosophy". From the perspective of the phenomenon, the phenomenon is the problem of inconsistency of Western literary theory errors. From the fundamental point of view, it points to the origin of the "battle of poetry and philosophy".

The series of views of compulsory interpretation theory are actually defending "poetry" from the perspective of literary interpretation, and restore the compulsory interpretation theory to the historical perspective of "Shi Zhe". The perspective of literature views literary interpretation from the great relationship between poetry and philosophy and constructs the theory of literary interpretation. Conversely, in the intervention of this historical perspective, forced interpretation, the development of the traditional proposition of "poetry and philosophy" from three aspects: "certainty", "rational" and "psychology" also clearly presented. More importantly, the relationship between "poetry" and "philosophy" is gradually expanded based on literary interpretation as the starting point: although the two have their own characteristics and fields, they should never be self -closed and their own camp.

- END -