Yellow River Review ｜ Literature is not "Jia", the literary world is a bit "shallow"

Public opinion is not always correct, and literature is not completely subjective. When the turbulent public opinion collides with literature, can people still get the fairness of expectations under the absence of professional opinions?

Silent Jia Qianqian

Since Jia Qianqian's release of rumors, saying that the three poems that have recently caused heated discussions are not after their own writing, a series of disputes, debates and doubts caused by the list of members of the proposed development member of the Writers Association, but they have not been stunned, but they are questioning and answering questions. During the process, it was still undercurrent.

In public events, few facts reversed, and public opinion not only did not follow up, but had more questions. For general social and public events, once authoritative information is released, there may be dissatisfaction or approval on the public opinion field, and the two parties will return to peace again after a brief confrontation.

This incident is different. From the perspective of the process, it can be described as twists and turns. The Chinese Writing Association released a list of members to develop membership, setting off the first wave of public opinion, and then questioned that the Chinese Writing Association canceled Jia Qianlian's qualifications. In the meantime, due to Jia Qianlian's initial silence, public opinion slipped towards the extreme that the association and himself could not be controlled. Judging from the results, the Chinese Writers Association took the closure of the "opinions of all parties". Jia Qianqian lost the opportunity to enter the national writer association, but what was left on the public opinion field was a question.

Faced with the poems in the name of Jia Qianqian in the "Snow Day", netizens made wonderful words, or satirical or ridiculous. And her silence at this time is equivalent to "default", or the manifestation of the guilty conscience, which has encouraged the fabrics of the fabricist. Before it was rumored, all kinds of articles signed in the name of Jia Qianlian were layered, and the public opinion field "smoke bomb" permeated.

Jia Qianqian was stubborn or arrogant. It was not until the Chinese Writers' Association rejected its entry. After the professional route could not be connected, it was the first time that it was rumored to the public. At this time, one is that it is difficult to reverse the impression of preconceived by personal strength, and the other is that there is no guarantee of the authoritative department, which will inevitably cause questioning and self -discipline. Moreover, the slow statement not only lacks strength, but also makes many Internet people feel "played". The emotions of the public opinion field in turn have further weakened the expected results. In fact, if these three poems are false, after Jia Qianqian's rumor statement comes out, this target should no longer exist. It seems that there are more room for discussion about whether they are eligible to enter the Chinese Writing Association. Most people have not shaken the attitude of facts because of facts, so that they have exposed the real target heart behind the three poems: Is there a preferential treatment in the literary field by relying on the prestige of the parents? Do you have the status of "second generation" to seize social resources in unfairness?

The heated discussion around Jia Qianqian ushered in the end of the dramatic, but the surface of public opinion was calm, but we could not forget the stone that had previously caused ripples: whether Jia Qianqian entered the list of members of the Writers Association, and always lacked a determination Answer, so that the storm ended, it is still embarrassing.

Association that should not be silent

The vague standard of admission and the right to speak in the literary world seems to be explained for some questions. It is true that Jia Qianqian's current social titles and publishing works, the procedure meets the conditions of admission, can only meet the procedure to obtain the application qualification. The comprehensive assessment of the level of the work is the final criterion for determining whether it can join the Writers Association. In this way, the original publicity list should include such considerations.

When the wind is quiet, the system will strictly start the procedure in the system, and the publicity and admission will be carried out step by step to display compliance and fairness. And the storms rose, the public's questions urgently needed to answer, and the Writers Association instead of a detailed explanation with the instructions of "listening to the opinions of all parties", which undoubtedly stimulated the imagination space.

Although Jia Qianqian did not speak to the public for the first time, the Chinese Writing Association rejected the "opinions of all parties" mentioned in the public announcement of Jia Qianlian, which should include the parties' explanation of the three poems that questioned the largest. Obviously, in the review of the Chinese Writers Association, such a explanation is not enough to support Jia Qianlian into the meeting. The doubts are full of public opinion.

The Chinese Writing Association hopes to resolve external contradictions with the process compliance in the system. In the end, it only allows himself to draw away, leaving Jia Qianqian, who is not accepted and trusted by netizens, and each echoing in the public opinion field after being lost. Sound sound and emotions.

Not only Jia Qianqian, all people who want to see a people who bring together mainstream writers can be destined to lose their comprehensive and professional opinions when they are indomitable.

In fact, after Jia Qianqian's rumors, the foundation of the initial question was unstable, and what could continue to support public opinion was extended from the doubts about Jia Qianqian's literary level to his doubts about his personal resume. The two transformed into the same thing to a certain extent, and then touched the pain points of social pain. Whether it is a celebrity is unfair to occupy social resources.

At this time, Jia Qianqian wrote something or did not write anything. Although the tortuous education experience could not prove that she could not write poetry, it would inevitably undertake the "father's halo". The self -evidence is based on the current level and future works as the "investment name" for turning over. The final point of this "investment name" is still the discussion of professionals and the public in the public domain.

In fact, it is not new to have lost their voice in social public events for many years. But when the impact of public opinion spread to the field of literature, the right to speak was completely controlled by public opinion, and the collective "absence" of professionals made people boo. The "jumping beam clown" in the public opinion field. "Poor is alone, and it is better to be alone." Perhaps it is the biggest problem that this group is facing. Back to the matter itself, in response to Jia Qianlian's doubts, the relevant units should give more professional and more detailed explanations. The source of the three pseudo -works should also be returned to the ins and outs. Shallow fairness.

In addition, the incident associations and the long -term problems existing in the writer's group, self -entertainment and self -entertainment in the circle, the humanistic mutual touting, "Ming Zhe protects the body" in front of the public opinion ... A group that should be needed for the timely disadvantages, full of edges and corners is comfortable. The environment is gradually passivation, and the tendency of refractive literature to become increasingly marginal also needs to be deeply pondered.

New Yellow River commentator: Zhang Chengdi Zhao Xiaoxin Editor: Sun Feifei

- END -