Zhu Ziqing | Very good, not necessarily "very" or "really", and not necessarily "good"

Zhu Ziqing (second from right) took a photo with friends in Tsinghua Garden

The words "very good" are really hanging on our mouths. We said, "Your idea is very good." "Your article is very good." "Zhang San is very good." "This thing is very good." People asked, "This matter is so like this, you What do you think? "We often replied," Very good. "Sometimes I added another, saying" very good and good. " Or not to say "very good", but saying "good", the same tone is the same. Don't all we have become "good sir"? We know that "Mr. Good" is either stupid or not, or the hometown of the city. Although there are many hometown wishes and stupidity, no one can believe that "very good", "really good" is stupid or hometown. The "very good" or "good" of the usual people's mantra is not necessarily "very" or "really", but not necessarily "good"; these two words actually only indicate the so -called "considerable respect, at least sympathy for sympathy "

In ordinary conversations, respect and sympathy seem to be much more important than truth. A person tells the truth everywhere, and everything is not only allowed to have knowledge and ability, but also to be awkward with others; this is not impatient, it is impossible to survive. Naturally, a person should always be serious, but when you do n’t have to be serious, you do n’t have to be serious; let people have a little respect and sympathy from your mouth, and to maintain a strong or light friendship between each other? The truth in the world. Saying "good" or "good", it is actually not objective, but the subjective favor. Using a little more good impression on your obedience, in exchange for the obedience to you a little bit good for you, that's it.

If you are an expert or a person, say a word Jiuding, then you should be a matter of name; you are not an expert or person, say good and bad, usually there is no matter how bad, saying that most people are talking about your mouth or bad temper. So why does it come? Even if you are an expert or a person, you can only seriously criticize it in your threshold. There are no universal experts or people in the world. Then, when you say the threshold, you still Isn't it the same with others? Do you have to focus on respect and sympathy? We listened to the sound of "good" or "good" sound of ourselves and others all day long. Everyone understands the weight of these two words anyway. If someone hopes that others will treat their own words as an exact comment, or they simply treat such words as their own exact comments, then they are really wished or stupid.

Zhu Ziqing and his family

I said "light", "fast", this is the so -called tone. As long as you are so light, you say "very good", "great", "great", the same, it is not painful anyway, but "very good", "It's good" "Say it lighter. However, the word "very", "true", "good", must have a slower saying, or that the whole child is heavier, the weight is different. At least you are expressing that you like that idea, that article, that person, that person, that thing, that method, etc., even if you still dare not confident your words, it is an exact comment. Sometimes I don't say a bit slower, but add some words before and after, such as "very good, cough!" "It's nice." "I believe Zhang San is very good." "You see, this thing is really true Okay. "I also like the tone. "Good" and other words can be made in the same way.

But although you "very" like or "true" like this, this one may not be "very", "really" is good, and even at all, it may not be "good". Although you said aggravated, the obedient people are just a little more respect and sympathy, and you cannot explain the objective value of this and that and that. If you are an ordinary person, this is enough to teach satisfaction. If you are an expert, someone, or a quasi -expert, or a person, you have to teach the obedient satisfaction, and you have to point out "good" there, or how "good". This is the obedient hopes for your objective praise and exact comment.

Say "good", "not bad", as "good", "really good"; say "very good", "very bad" or "really good", "really not bad", but it is a plus word "Very good", "great". "Good" is only one word, "good", "not bad" is two words; when we speak, sometimes it is shorter than more emotional. This is an example. "Good" plus "very" or "true" can be as "good", "not bad", "good", "not bad" plus "very" or "true", naturally better than "very good "," It's so good ". However, it is not good to say that "not good", there is not so many shadows. Like the "Speaking '" Bad "and the" bad things in the old novels "and" big things are bad "often heard in the old drama, it can be represented. The word "no" here also maintains its independent value and negative full quantities. Unlike "good", the word "no" "no" has melted in the idiom, and there is not much energy. Originally, since there is a "good" word on "good", there is no need to hide again; at most you clamp a word in the middle, say "not good", "not good", but it sounds sounded, but it sounds sounded, but it sounds sounded, but it sounds sounded, but it sounds sound like it, but it sounds like it sounds, but it sounds like it sounds, but it sounds like It's almost the same.

Zhu Ziqing (right) and Ye Shengtao

Having said that, since it is not necessarily "very" or "true", even at all, it may not be "good". Why not be silent? Don't be silent, but do you want to say something, isn't it boring perfunctory? But silence is not easy, you have to have that kind of patience. Silence can be "no opinion", it can be "indifferent" or "bad", but the obedient can easily interpret your silence as "not good", at least you will feel that you are too cold, even A little respect and sympathy at your mouth are regrettable. In this kind of scene, if you are not born or refined, you can bear what you don't say something! To say, it is nothing more than "very good", "really good". Life in the world, when you do n’t have to be serious, you love a little more love, less hate, and seem to be boring; perfunctory is unique, and it seems that you ca n’t say a few good words that are indifferent. I have repeatedly said obedient. Of course, the emotional response of obedient people is of course concerned. No one is willing to look at the embarrassing face, right? Cheap respects and sympathy can cover people's embarrassing faces, and the original is also self -interesting; a stone hit two birds, how can it not be happy in the usual situation? Of course, there are some things in the world that are easy to face, but there are some things that are difficult in person. Just say that the comment is good or bad, and it is more free to face. This is not to say that you can put cold arrows behind it to say bad things about others. One person has his own identity, there are obedient, and you can do this! This is just that behind others, there is less scruples, and respect and sympathy may be useful. Although there may be that relatives and friends in the middle of the obedient at this time, it is separated by a layer; you say "not good" or "not good", and it is about to see the embarrassing face. It is not possible to do it. When my face says that he is "bad", it is not possible. When many people say that he is "bad", it is not even better. When many people say that they are "not good", it is simply the enemy; only when many people face the "bad" point of this point, maybe it is a sloppy. Therefore, the usual comments are always "very good" and "good". ——It also says "very good", "really good", that must be a bit slower.

But since it is not necessarily "good" or "true", even at all, it may not be "good". Isn't it "good"? Why must you add "very" or "true"? Originally, we answered "OK?" Or "What do you think?" He often only says "good". But only in the answer, it is not possible to do so. One reason is the practice of Chinese language. Specific adjectives or described words are often comparative. For example, "this blossoming red", "this flower is pure", "this flower looks good" is really "this flower is more red than other blossoms", "this flower is cleaned than other flowers", "this flower is better than other than otherwise other than another other flower. The meaning of flowers ". Saying "your idea is good", "You are good in this article", "Zhang San is good", "this thing is good", it also means "better than something else". Another reason is the practice of the word "good". The word "good" in the sentence is sometimes "bad". If you say "Hello!" Or shook his head and said, "Zhang Sanhao, now ignore me." "They are good, I ignore this." Because of this When we respect and sympathize with a little bit, you have to say it lightly, borrowing two words "good" or "good".

(Originally contained in Kunming "Central Daily · Pingming Supplement" in 1939)

Zhu Ziqing is the most beautiful writer in modern Chinese prose. The famous articles such as "Spring", "The Qinhuai River in Passage Lights", "Back", "Lotus Pond Moonlight" are the classics of modern prose and become a example of writing. This book has more than sixty classic texts in Zhu Ziqing, and is equipped with more than 30 precious photos of Zhu Ziqing and relatives and friends. The essay collection is excellent, the arrangement is unique, and each series is arranged in the order of time, showing the charm of the writer's spirit, aesthetics, fun, and text style in the current changes. The "Introduction" made by Professor Wu Xiaodong, the Chinese Department of Peking University, to help readers better understand the characteristics of Zhu Ziqing prose.

Chinese modern and contemporary master prose collection

The original flavor of the famous articles, the expert's guide is clear and open

Read the classics of prose, understand the breath, knowledge and wisdom of the Chinese

Chinese modern and contemporary master prose collection series (first series)

It has been listed now, and self -operated stores such as Jingdong, Dangdang, Tmall and other self -employed stores can be purchased

"Chinese modern and contemporary master prose collection" (first series) Author photo

Preliminary review of the manuscript: Wen Chun, Zhou Bei

Manuscript review: Wang Wei

Manuscript final trial: Wang Qiuling

- END -