"Interdisciplinary" non -"interdisciplinary discipline" -D digital humanistic application in literary research

Abstract: One of the basic characteristics of digital humanities is interdisciplinary. The research of interdisciplinary research pursues the two basic principles of "walking in" and "looking back", that is, the reference and integration of disciplines on the basis of in -depth understanding of other disciplines, rather than the dissolution of the discipline itself. After entering the digital age, although literary research is facing the urgent task of paradigm renewal, it should not give up its inherent humanistic care. Digital humanistic methods provide cross -disciplinary vision and new technical means for the paradigm update of literary research, but it is difficult to appreciate the fundamental task of appreciation and judging this literary research. Therefore, digital humanities can become an effective auxiliary means of literary research, but cannot ban the fundamental and soul of literary research.

Keywords: Literary research digital humanistic interdisciplinary digitalization

Author Yang Guo, Associate Professor of Humanities and Sciences Center of Southern University of Science and Technology (Shenzhen 518055).

Source: "Chinese Literature Critical" 2022, Issue 2 P167 — P174

Editor in charge: Ma Zheng

After the early "Humanities Computing" stage of application, the concept of "Digital Humanities" officially appeared in the domestic and foreign academic circles in the early 21st century, and has increasingly become a popular term that contemporary humanities clubs cannot ignore. In the course of the development of digital humanities, there are two trajectories worthy of attention: First, regardless of Chinese and foreign, the research themes and main directions of digital humanities are gradually manifested as "digital humanities and technical foundations", "geography and visualization", "digital and text" "" Four aspects of the four aspects of digital humanities and public cultural services "are concentrated and diversified; second, in the field of humanities and social sciences, digital humanities have roughly experienced a" statistical -book intelligence and archives -communication -geography - History -Literature "has gradually advanced the interdisciplinary application process, and more and more digital humanities have appeared in contemporary literature research. The development trajectory of digital humanities shows that "digitalization" and "interdisciplinary" are their basic characteristics, and literary research is its inevitable application area. "Digitalization" focuses on the technical discussion, which is generally not easy to cause major controversy; "interdisciplinary" and theoretical and methods are always in the dual vortex of conceptual definition and practical application, and the number of "interdisciplinary" understanding of numbers The application of humanities is just a decisive role. In fact, interdisciplinary disciplines are still based on disciplines. It emphasizes that on the basis of a certain discipline, it boldly "walk in", understand the theory and methods of other disciplines, and do not forget to "look back" to realize other to other for other. Disciplinary reference and integration. For literary researchers in the digital age, understanding the important inspiration and new possibilities brought about by digital humanities for literary research, boldly drawing on its related results and effective methods, has become an unavoidable task. At the same time, it is more important to clarify the characteristics of literary research and adhere to the basic position of literary criticism. In the digital era, the paradigm update of literary research has become inevitable, but the base point of its humanistic care should not be changed. Digital humanistic methods have obvious advantages in data analysis and other aspects, but they cannot replace researchers to directly use the appreciation and evaluation function. The introduction of digital humanistic methods in literary research is to deepen the discipline of literary research under a more comprehensive and diverse perspective, rather than moving towards disciplines.

Digital humanities' interdisciplinary base points and inherent demands of literary research

From the perspective of the word constructor, the "digital" and "Humanities" are originally interested in the two words. Of course, the reason why cross -disciplinary disciplines become the basic characteristics and keywords of digital humanities are not based on the righteousness of the word shape, but have a specific theoretical basis.

Because the development of digital humanities is not long, and both advocates have their own goals, this "hot word" still has no uniform definition. In several representative views, David M. Berry and Anders Fagerjord regarded it as "applying computer technology to the cutting -edge disciplines of humanistic research in humanistic research "; Anne Burdick, etc.," Digital humanities refer to the cooperation, cross -disciplinary research, teaching and publishing new academic models and organizational forms of cooperative, interdisciplinary research, teaching and publishing of computer technology; "A new academic trend and research method" characterized by interdisciplinary disciplines; Wang Jun and Zhang Liyuan emphasized that digital humanities are a "attracting multiple" attracting linguistics, literature, history, geography, computers, books and intelligence, etc. The "interdisciplinary research field" of disciplines "is" closer to a 'discipline community' "compared to" disciplines "; A series of methods for solving the research of humanities in the field of humanities ". It can be seen that whether the digital humanities are regarded as a discipline, an academic organization and form, trend and method, or a research field, or a practice, Chinese and foreign scholars are unanimously identified by the "interdisciplinary" characteristics of digital humanities. Essence Therefore, as long as the digital humanities are discussing the awareness of "interdisciplinary", this is self -evident.

Since cross -disciplinary disciplines are the key to grasping digital humanities, clarifying the concept of "interdisciplinary" has a decisive significance for correcting digital humanities and effective application in literary research. On the issue of the relationship between interdisciplinary and literary research, in 1984, the Qian Shushu, which was "advocated to introduce computer technology into Chinese classical literature in Chinese classical literature" in 1984. Thinking. In the opinion of Qian Yanshu, the reason why the interdisciplinary research of literature is established is first because there are different disciplines, secondly there are inextricable connections between the subject objects, and the literary researcher himself is the knowledge of knowledge. There is always a comprehensive and Huitong demand. In an article that explains the "poetry" in the category of Chinese classical poetry, he combed the above meaning to understand:

We talk about the West and modern times. The various objects of humanities are connected to each other, interactive, not only across national borders, connect the era, but also penetrate different disciplines. Due to the severe limitations of human life and intelligence, for the sake of convenience, we can only make the research field narrower narrower, and divide the special disciplines. There is no way. Therefore, becoming an expert in a certain science, although subjectively is proud, and objectively.

The biggest difference between modern academics and classical periods is that the emergence of discipline classification and increasingly specialized. Modern academic divisions are not purely human -based design, but under the result of the surge in social knowledge and the various problems that have been developed far more than the human individual life and wisdom, under the role of their own development laws. Therefore, as long as the situation of the knowledge explosion has not changed, as long as humans still cannot get rid of their own limitations, the existence of the discipline is inevitable. However, the division of disciplines is not absolute, and it is impossible for disciplines to "do nothing for the old death." From another perspective, although the division of the discipline has become a fact, there are often inextricable connections between the research objects of each discipline. In this case, if you want to reach a thorough understanding of these objects, jump out of yourself. The discipline threshold, actively integrating into the relevant discipline vision, has become a natural choice. After all, the discipline is not divided into disciplines. Different disciplines originally originated from a common knowledge mother.

Since the establishment of various disciplines is inevitable and necessary, the demands of opening the discipline are affectionate and reasonable, so in the specific practice of literary research, the discussion of interdisciplinary disciplines has become the meaning of the topic. And how to adhere to the disciplinary position, on the one hand, through the vision of other people's vision, the perception of literature itself has become the key to interdisciplinary exploration in the field of literature research. On this issue, the relevant discussions of Qian Yanshu are also important to enlighten people.

In the article "Reading" Lao Kong ", Qian Yanshu talked about Didro's famous view" Actor must be calm in his heart in order to reflect the enthusiastic emotion of the role ", and quote the Chinese proverb" Learn the ruthlessness first. "Talking with it after learning the drama vividly revealed the interpretation and interpretation of the experience of western classic drama theory and the experience of Chinese folk drama, and then used Hegel's views on the process of human cognition. "Looking back and looking at each other", point out that "the understanding of things to getting habits" and "acquaintance from the old to the truth into the truth".

"Looking back at each other's eyes", although it is for cross -cultural, cross -language comparative poetic research, but it is extremely just an authentic "cross" methodological significance and its implementation method: "cross" means "me" direction from "I" direction direction direction. "He"; approaching and understanding "he" often promotes us to look at ourselves and re -understand the characteristics of the "I" who is not inspecting the original practice, and fight against the province. Specifically, in terms of the practice of interdisciplinary disciplines, that is, first follow a certain connection between objects, materials or problems, break through the boundaries of their own disciplines, and actively invest in the field of knowledge and academic fields of other related disciplines, and then look back at themselves from the eyes of others. Get a new understanding of your own discipline under a new perspective.

Qian Yanshu's relevant discussions on interdisciplinary research can be simplified into six words, namely "walk in" and "see back". "Go in" refers to the discipline of "cross", not satisfied with the understanding of the floating light, pursuing in -depth understanding and careful understanding, and as much as possible to the "expert" standard as much as possible on related issues. "Looking back" emphasizes that after crossing the subject barriers, "walk in", you should still return to your own discipline vision and context, and re -examine his own discipline under the observation of others. These two processes are also echoed in the two principles of "reference discipline insights" and "integration insights" advocated by Allen F. REPKO. The interdisciplinary discipline is not a whistling after chatting between different disciplines (Corss-DISCIPLINARY), but an immersive understanding and interdisciplinary in their own disciplines and other disciplines; interdisciplinary research is not The theoretical and methods of one discipline are above the other discipline, but "look back and look at each other", that is, through the perspective of another discipline, to deepen the understanding of this discipline related issues and promote the further development of this discipline. This is the basic principle that all interdisciplinary research should follow, and cross -disciplinary exploration in the field of literary research is no exception.

Because cross -disciplinary disciplines are both the basic characteristics of digital humanities and the inherent demands of literary research since modern times, the application of digital humanities in the field of literary research is inevitable. At present, digital humanities are more integrated into the research of different humanities and social sciences in the field of different humanities and social sciences in the form of cross -fusion method theory. This is especially true of digital humanities in the field of literary research. Because the interdisciplinary disciplines of digital humanities are not the communication between similar disciplines, but the opening and fusion of natural science and humanities and social sciences with great theoretical and methods, the implementation of the principles of "walk in" and "look back" Obviously there is a threshold. Do not understand computer programming and algorithms, just use popular software to tinker works frequently. It is difficult to obtain the recognition and conviction of mature readers like unknown the theory of literary theory. Therefore, for the literary researcher who intends to use digital humanistic methods, in addition to the courage and foundation of other disciplines with great differences in the difference, clarify the basic requirements of literary research in the digital age, understand the shortness of the digital humanistic methods itself, It is equally important. Paradigy and basic characteristics of literary research in digital age

(1) The inevitability of literary research paradigm updates

Based on digital technology, cloud computing, Internet, mobile smart terminals, etc., the digital era swept inadvertently, greatly changing contemporary society and life, and the field of literary research was no exception. From production to consumption, from objects to materials, today's literature existence has undergone all -round changes compared with the past. Traditional literary research paradigms are becoming more and more difficult to cope with today's research needs.

First of all, new changes have taken place in literary creation. First, AI and algorithms appeared in the creative body. Multi -person joint creation of human -machine collaborative creations and breakthroughs in time and space is no longer a legend. For example, since the 21st century, "writing robots" mainly used in the fields of news, financial reports and other fields have begun to enter the literary and art circles. Taking Microsoft Xiaobing as an example, since pushing the modern poem collection "Sunshine Lost Glass Window" in 2017, the AI ​​author has almost maintained the creative rhythm of publishing one work each year, and all four works have also enjoyed copyright. Should today's literary researchers face up to this phenomenon? The answer should be yes. In the concentration of four modern poems, Xiaobing has significantly improved the gradual improvement of language ability. It proves that on the basis of the evolution of algorithms, AI writers can also be "growth" in literary expression like human authors. Literature and text; and the "nine songs" developed by the Tsinghua team and the "Lefu" designed by Huawei, some ancient poems created even reached the level that is difficult to discern with human works. Whether it is to deny AI writers, these phenomena are enough to trigger reflection on literary creative subjects and make the discussion of the creative subject deeper. Obviously, the original theory and methods are difficult to apply for AI writers. Second, the carrier of the literary creation platform and the work has also changed. As far as online literature is concerned, after the early "Banyan Tree", a large number of online virtual communities such as "Starting Point" have become the first writing platform and publishing position for various authors. Methods, successively in the world. That is to say, the above -mentioned various website platforms not only published the works of online literature authors, but also recorded their creative process simultaneously, so that online literature works have become visible from the process to results. These have gradually overflowing the effective areas of social historical analysis and other theories, and put forward new topics for contemporary literary criticism.

Secondly, the literary research objects have undergone tremendous changes. In the context of the rapid development of the Internet, digital technology, and artificial intelligence algorithm, some new literary categories came into being, such as online novels and AI literature mentioned above. Urgently need to be explained. Discussion or criticism of these new texts will also help deepen the understanding of literary "literature". In addition, the output of these new works is massive. According to the statistics of relevant scholars, online novels have been on the Internet since 2011. Only millions of them have long. Microsoft Xiaobing can generate three poems in just a few seconds after the user uploads a picture. The ancient poetry creative systems such as "Nine Songs" and "Lefu" are also desirable in terms of production. The product gathers is a astronomical number. Under the traditional literary criticism paradigm, reading works are the basic requirements for researchers. In the face of today's online novels and AI literature text, this task is obviously incomparable. Even if you do not talk about AI literature and online novels, with the realization of the global network and all things, the massive literary works of other countries and nations can be "near the eyes" even if they are "far away". Contemporary researchers are the same. Can't turn a blind eye to this.

Third, the literary consumption method is very different from the past. First, unlike the paper era, a large number of literary works will publish e -books simultaneously today. These e -books may be sold to readers through different platforms or reading software in the form of the whole book. They may also provide readers with a limited time and limited reading permissions by selling points or reading coins; it is also likely to sell reading software by selling reading software Or the method of website cycle service merged with different styles of works, and readers are freely selected. Second, with the help of digital multimedia technology, readers can easily record reading experience through relevant software or quickly check other works and information, build a multi -text reading platform such as text, sound, and images to achieve three -dimensional and diverse reading reading Effect. Third, the emergence of virtual books has made the "reading" of "reading" new connotations; and with the emergence of "sound books", "listening books" is also becoming more and more readers' choice. The "experiential reading" or "immersive reading" discussed by traditional literary theory discusses is increasingly from the inside out today, manifested as a kind of external concrete and sensory reality. The above changes have exceeded the scope of application of previous literary production theories and readers' reaction criticism, and today's researchers need to respond. Finally, the research materials of literature are unprecedented and easy to use. The emergence and continuous optimization of digital technologies make scholars' expectations of "comprehensive possession of research materials" to come true. The "comprehensive" level of these materials far exceeds people's imagination. The advancement of digital storage technology has enabled massive resources to easily store in a light and light medium or intangible network space such as disk, disc Reality. The emergence of OCR text recognition technology has simplified the search and arrangement of the huge amount of literature and the arrangement of the indexes into several keyboards and mouses several times. All these kinds of researchers who have traveled to libraries across the country and even around the world for searching for literature are ecstatic and brought new troubles -dozens of times or even counting the relevant research materials retrieved. When it exceeds its own estimates, is it time to stick to his teeth, "sweep the leaves", or do you take a different approach to effectively choose? This is obviously another methodological problem that the current literary research community must answer.

The new problems brought by the digital age to literature research are far more than the above. However, in response to the above four problems, the traditional paradigm has been a little tired. New literary questions call a new paradigm that dares to "walk in" to natural disciplines and meet the needs of the digital age.

(2) Humanistic care and aesthetic appreciation as a literary research characteristics

Of course, the update of paradigms is not to ban the crystallization of previous discipline philosophy and experience, and it is not to eliminate disciplines. In academic history, each successful paradigm transformation is characterized by strengthening the discipline and promoting discipline development. The discipline of literature has its own characteristics and goals. No matter how to promote the paradigm update of literary research, it should not shake the fundamental and soul of literary research. Only by grasping these two points can the researchers do not lose their direction when they are "looking back."

Literature research is inseparable from humanistic care, which is the foundation of literary research. When talking about the issue of digital humanities, some scholars once pointed out: "The purpose of humanistic research is to think about the various issues of humanity, life, human life (society and history), and put forward opinions. This is the ontology of humanistic research. And the subject. Questions and thoughts are the core of humanistic research. "Although here is a broad humanistic research issue, as an important part of humanities, it should also adhere to the thinking of" human nature, life, and human life ". Base point. Whether it is the discussion of literary history, literary theory, and literary criticism, they should not ignore the thinking about human problems. In the final analysis, literature is still "human learning", which is the foothold of literary research, even in the digital age.

In addition to the common characteristics of this humanistic discipline, literature also has the characteristics of other disciplines such as history and philosophy, that is, aesthetic. As an art, literature, its maximum value and basic feature lies in aesthetics. Literature has its own value standards, and has the right to jump out of artistic processing and aesthetic transmission. Therefore, regardless of reading literary works or literary research, we should not ignore the understanding and experience of literary and artistic traits. Aesthetic is the soul of literature, and is another base point that cannot be ignored in literary research. Regardless of how the creative body, production process, text form, etc. in the digital age, literary research must not deviate from the "soul" of the literature of the aesthetic nature.

The length of the data analysis of digital humanities and the shortcomings of appreciation and judgment

(1) Analysis of data as a digital humanistic "powerful weapon"

Digital humanities originated from "humanistic computing". Therefore, in digital humanities methods, data analysis occupies the basic position and also best reflects the advantages of digital humanities. With this "powerful weapon", the practitioners of digital humanities have achieved a series of valuable results in literary research.

First of all, use digital technology to develop and establish a large -scale literary research database with rich total resource and powerful auxiliary functions. For example, the "Song Poetry Analysis System" developed by Li Duo, a Chinese Department of Peking University in 2005, the "New Year's New Map Platform" developed by Wang Zhaopeng team of Central South China University of Ethnology and launched in 2017, and the "Literature Laboratory" of Stanford University The 19th -century novel database, etc., basically use digital technology to "digital integration" with relevant literature in history to form a large database, so that it has functions such as retrieval and statistical analysis. Based on digital technology and text recognition technology, the rapid and accurate information extraction and comprehensive data compilation analysis based on the user's needs is a common feature of these databases. The collection, sorting and analysis of academic resources is the starting point of all research. The concept of "data is capital" has become more and more consensus in the digital age. Therefore, the achievements of digital humanities in the construction of professional databases have become their literary research in literary research. The most eye -catching and recognized benchmark. Secondly, use data mining and other technologies to analyze the frequency statistics and words of words and words in terms of specific literary texts, to reveal the text details that traditional literary research methods cannot or are unable to find, and read carefully with traditional literary history methods, text read carefully, etc. Complement. For example, on the basis of technologies such as data retrieval, data mining, and image retrieval, Liu Jingchen combines GIS and OCR software to automate the rhythm, language, style, etc. Relevant insights, rich poems and even basic work methods related to poetry appreciation, clean up the source flow and changes in the style, and conduct non -predictable exploration of "non -structured text", which proves the automation of machine automation based on big data. Analysis of the value of the methodology of literary history research. Zhao Wei borrowed the analysis and interpretation of the "Social Network Analysis" and visual analysis of the "Big Wave" trilogy, character relationships and social networks, to discuss the narrative functions of key figures in the novel and reveal the value of its historical novels. Make up the abstraction of classic narrative methods and the ideological bias of postmodern narrative methods.

Thirdly, using software tools in natural science research to incorporate the study of writer's work into a new perspective combining text analysis and field survey, focus on seeking breakthroughs in the theoretical level of literary research, and then try to establish a new poetic system. For example, on the basis of inspecting literary history related literature, Jian Jinsong uses the GPS data obtained in paper text and field surveys to carry out geographical labeling on the Google Earth Pro satellite map. And hereby discuss the possibility of establishing a new "local poetics". This not only provides new methods for the interpretation of the writer's works, but also to make useful explorations for digital humanities with technical iterative theory update.

Of course, the application cases of digital humanities in literary research are of course more than above. However, through the three aspects of resource construction, research methods and theoretical discussion, they can still grasp the overall achievements and their overall achievements and their overall achievements in the current field of literary research. The advantage is. Database design and construction and related tool development, data mining, image analysis and visualization technology application, social network analysis and natural science software, these are based on or serving data analysis. In the practice of digital humanities, data analysis can be called its most basic and core part.

(2) Literary appreciation and judgment that algorithms and software cannot be spontaneous

The effective application of digital humanistic methods in the field of literary research is encouraging. However, even the most remarkable data analysis of digital humanities still has the limitations that cannot be ignored in literary research. The statistical analysis of the work of the writer's work is only the starting point of literary research. The exploration of new literary theory based on digital humanities has just started. As mentioned earlier, the fundamental and souls of literature are humanistic care and aesthetic appreciation. Correspondingly, the real goal of literary research, especially literary criticism, has always revealed the meaning of life in the work, analyzes its humanistic thoughts, and comments its aesthetic value. This is a typical appreciation and judgment work, which depends on the artistic cultivation and understanding and judgment of researchers. Limited to the bottleneck of artificial intelligence algorithms, and digital humanities methods can only play an auxiliary role at the deep goal of literary research. Machine analysis cannot replace human researchers' literary interpretation.

First, data analysis cannot get rid of the mechanization of its operation methods. First, digitalization and image recognition provides massive resources for literary research. In this way, the ideal of "exhausting all resources" in database construction cannot be implemented 100 %. Although more and more developers realize that the establishment of an absolutely complete database is just a beautiful dream, but data analysis always takes this ideal integrity as an imaginary premise. Second, even if all related literatures are digitized, can these digital resources especially the picture resources be fully identified? Taking ancient literature as an example, there are both carvings and prints and books in the literature. For the current scanning equipment, the electronicization of all the above documents is not a problem. However, under the current OCR technology conditions, it is difficult to achieve accurate identification of the latter. A digital text that cannot be recognized is obviously meaningful for data analysis. Third, and the most important point. The basis of data analysis is big data and intelligent cloud computing. It is found in a large amount of resources and establishing contacts in the chaos. Filtering, because artificial intelligence does not have the judgment of human unique to separate from big data. However, everyone with common sense of literature knows that even if it is just a solitary book, it is sometimes enough to have a significant impact on the research of the entire literary history. The value of the literature is not necessarily proportional to the scale of the literature. Combined with the two points mentioned earlier, in those literatures that have not digitized, maybe mixed with important materials; in the digital documents that cannot be identified and cannot be included in statistical analysis, there may also be an important writer important The beads of works or innovative insights. Blind dependence on statistics and probability theory, it is impossible to complete the task of literary research. Secondly, in the discussion of new methods and new ideas, digital humanities are inseparable from statistical analysis and probability operations. In terms of specific problems, we use summary and induction as the basic characteristics. Although it is also necessary to summarize in literary research, a single induction is the "careful verification", which is difficult to reach the "bold assumption" level. Taking the interpretation of literary works as an example, with the help of digital humanities, you may find the literary characteristics of a certain work to sort out the evolution of its version and reveal its mutual literature, but it is difficult to make its artistic value, let alone a specific aesthetic appreciation. It's right. Therefore, the main role of digital humanities in literary research is "supplement" -or discovering a literary development trend that is not easy to detect, or to reveal some kind of connection hidden between objects. Digital humanities can play a role of leakage and lack of existing literary research, enrich its method system, but it is difficult to raise forward -looking issues. It takes initiative to discover new ideas and achieve new breakthroughs with active discovery of literary research. It is in this sense that the positioning of digital humanities in the field of literary research may only be methodologies, not the theory of body.

Third, even with the further development of digital technology and the breakthrough of possible algorithms, future digital humanities began to participate in the construction of literary theory, and even participate in the tasks of certain literary judgment. It cannot change the positioning of its auxiliary tools. The construction of literary theory is inseparable from the support of literary concepts and aesthetic spirit, which obviously exceeds the effective radius of digital humanistic methods. Literary appreciation is a very subjective and personalized aesthetic perception process. Digital analysis software with the same data and algorithm driven methods is difficult to have such differentiated evaluation capabilities. In addition, although data analysis in the scope of the spread and influence, reading frequency, etc., can indeed provide a certain reference for the value judgment of literary works, and even generate a judgment report on the basis of this, but because the algorithms and software cannot formulate aesthetic standards independently. These are these. These The function can only be achieved under the standards set by human beings. After all, the entire judgment mechanism cannot be separated from human design and supervision. In this case, the judgment made by algorithms and software on the surface still belongs to the judgment of human researchers themselves.

Of course, pointing out that the above problems are not the significance of digital humanities, but to ask researchers who actively explore the new paradigm of literary research: Digital humanities' cross -disciplinary methods do help open a new space for literary research, so it is worthy of bold reference. However, literary research has its own characteristics. After the researchers "enter" other disciplines and realize the integrated vision of a certain level, they should still not forget "looking back", that is, back to their own problem domains, thinking and solving literature to solve literature question.

Conclusion

Since globalization, the connection between the world has become increasingly close, with frequent cultural exchanges, and gradually emerging in industrial cooperation and cross -disciplinary disciplines. These have laid the foundation of cultural, economic and consciousness for the rapid growth of interdisciplinary practice. Under the support of various discipline databases, global knowledge sharing is no longer a dream, which undoubtedly provides convenient channels and solid foundation for the prosperity of interdisciplinary research; with the help of new technical means, humans overcome themselves to a certain extent. The limitations of knowledge structure, the diversification of knowledge structure, and the diversification of research have become reality in more and more people, and the last concern of interdisciplinary research seems to have disappeared. However, the purpose of interdisciplinary disciplines is not to ban previous discipline classifications, but to break the inherent discipline boundaries under the proposition of the new era. On the one hand, seek communication and cooperation with other majors. On the other hand Bow in the province, deepen the recognition of your own discipline, and obtain new ideas and methods of obtaining discipline development. Logically speaking, "interdisciplinary" must be based on the presence of "disciplines". The interdisciplinary discipline without discipline support can only be empty words; in fact, no matter how technical means, the limitation of human life and intelligence is not limited. It may disappear completely. A person always has the discipline skills and knowledge of knowledge that is most familiar and good at, and there is always a knowledge system that is relatively rigid or even diaphragm. The "cross" discipline is not a "solution" discipline, nor can it be "solved" discipline. The application of digital humanities in literary research best reflects the division of natural scientific research and humanities research, and also shows the importance of adhering to the basic principles of interdisciplinary disciplines.自然科学强调实证、强调数据，研究中以归纳为主；人文学科尤其是文学学科，虽然自19世纪以来大量借鉴了自然科学的方法，却从未对“偶然性”“不确定性”甚至“非"Close" closed the door. As a positive attempt to open up liberal arts, digital humanities inspire literary research, and the methods that bring literary research are undoubtedly valuable. It is not arrested on some literary issues. Although it is worthy of attention and analysis, it is not necessary to be too nervous, and it is even regarded as an evidence that the liberal arts science is inseparable. In the final analysis, natural sciences and humanities are the means of human cognitive world and self -cognitive self. There are no differences between the two, and the complementarity between them is far greater than the opposition. Promoting cross -disciplinary research on the basis of this understanding, the development of digital humanities may be more calm, and its application in the field of literary research may be more effective.

- END -