The normal cooperation between the Sino -Russian Arctic, but NATO has accused the rake and accusations to make excuses for military expansion?

The Russian Satellite News A few days ago, NATO Secretary -General Stoltenberg claimed that the cooperation between Russia and China in the Arctic region did not meet the interests of NATO during the visit to Canada, so NATO will strengthen the existence in the region. Stoltenberg also claimed that NATO believes that the Arctic region is vital to ensure collective safety, because North Pole can become the fastest way for Russian missiles to attack the United States. In response, Constantine Cosachev, vice chairman of the Russian Council of Russia, said Stoltenberg's remarks on cooperation between Russia and China in the Arctic region were another threat to the interests of Moscow and Beijing. Cosachev pointed out that in the past five years, NATO's military activities in the Arctic region have doubled in terms of quantity. NATO member states of non -North Polar countries, even non -NATO member states, have participated in this activity more and more.

China and Russia's cooperation on the Arctic have indeed been increasing in recent years, but most of them are cooperation in the field of people's livelihood research. For example, the North Pole energy projects, as well as the "Snowflake" international Arctic Station project initiated by Russia, have participated in varying degrees. What is most afraid of western countries is that China and Russia have an initiative to jointly build the "Ice Silk Road". The most important point of this initiative is to open up the "Arctic Channel". In this way, China can directly reach Europe from the Arctic. The blockade of the United States on the southeast coast of China will not break. This is actually a good thing for the entire world. After all, the new channel represents new business opportunities.

This is the cooperation between China and Russia that makes NATO can't see it, saying that it does not meet the interests of NATO countries. NATO countries should strengthen their existence in the North Pole in order to fight against China and Russia. In fact, NATO is not afraid of the development of the Arctic. They are just afraid that the benefits and influence brought by the development of the Arctic will not be controlled by NATO. This is the naked hegemonism. All the cooperation and interests of this world want to insert it. Russia is now accusing Russia's development of the Arctic's collective threat, because the Arctic can become the fastest way for Russian missiles to attack the United States. Whether the Arctic Development, Russia's missiles are the fastest way to attack the United States. This is an objective fact, not a reason for NATO to target the China -Russia Arctic cooperation.

China and Russia's establishment of "a new era of comprehensive strategic collaboration partners" is a new type of great power that does not form alliances. We will never target any third -party country. It will not threaten any country in the world. The cooperation between the two countries in the North Pole has almost no military projects. In contrast, NATO itself has continuously strengthened the existence of the Arctic region in recent years. This is obviously to curb Russia's development in the Arctic region, and it is also a kind of pressure on the cooperation between the Sino -Russian Arctic field. From this, it can be seen that as long as it is advocated by China and Russia, it is almost opposed by NATO, they have always wanted to cooperate to defeat the two major powers of China and Russia. In this way, their leadership in the world will be more stable, and the hegemony of the United States will also lose its constraints and completely bully the entire world.

Now NATO has accused China -Russia Arctic cooperation, and Russia accused Russia of restarting hundreds of military bases in the Arctic during the Soviet Union, saying that Russia also tested a new weapon system in the Arctic. These claims are actually promoting "Sino -Russian threats". The purpose of this is to better unite the internal power of NATO and confront China and Russia. After all, there are quite a lot of differences in NATO, and it is difficult for the United States to twist NATO countries into a rope. On the other hand, it is for the use of the military expansion of NATO. The pace of NATO eastward expansion has been completely ended by Russia's "special military operations" of Ukraine. Now the situation in Russia and Ukraine is still in stalemate. Then the North Pole is likely to become a new direction of NATO, and relying on this NATO can better block Russia.

However, the Moumou of NATO countries is destined to be useless, and Russia will never endure the continuous expansion and blockade of NATO. Ukraine is proof and persecution is too much. Russia will do it directly. What's more, the cooperation between the Arctic of China and Russia is continuously strengthened, especially the cooperation in the energy field, which is related to the common interests of the two countries. The two countries will inevitably work with the oppression of hegemonism, and threatening the interests of China and Russia will face the joint resistance of China and Russia. As long as China and Russia can cooperate with each other, the relationship is not provoked by Western countries, and the NATO's NATO is estimated to be helpless.

- END -