Chen Bing: The nuclear does not diffuse the treaty for review, who should be responsible for the United States and Russia?

Direct news: The "Treaty of Nuclear Disvoy Weapons", which is reviewed once in five years, is still no result after two reviews. Who do you think is responsible?

Special commentator Chen Bing: The Treaty of the Nuclear Real -diffusion of Weapons is reviewed every 5 years. The meeting should have been held in 2020 and has been postponed to the present due to the new crown epidemic. But unfortunately, countries have objections to achievement documents and cannot reach consensus, so the review conference failed to form a final document. Who should be responsible for this? The United States accused Russia, saying that the agreement file was not passed because of Russia's obstruction. Russia counterattacked, saying that Ukraine and its Western guardians should take responsibility for it. Russia attacks Ukraine and its western guardians in the final document to include concerns about the situation of Zapolo Nuclear Power Station. It is to promote its political policy at all costs, rather than truly concerned about nuclear non -diffusion mechanisms, and do not really pay attention to global issues. The United States is doing its best to promote its priority, while eliminating important issues of other countries to the results documents. Therefore, Russia believes that this is an unequal game and discriminate against some countries, so it cannot be acceptable.

This accusation in Russia still makes some reason, the United States does put its own interests in priority. When the "Nuclear Non -diffusing Weapon Treaty" was considered in 2015, the phenomenon that failed to pass the final document also appeared. The main reason was that the United States proposed at that time to establish a large -scale killing weapon area in the Middle East, because the United States' war in Afghanistan did not have no war in Afghanistan. At the same time, it is also fighting with the extreme organization "Islamic State". Speaking of the end, the document proposes to establish a nuclear zone in the Middle East, which may affect the interests of the American allies Israel. In the end, the differences fail to resolve and there is no final document. If you look at the US approach, including the development of the Australian nuclear submarine fleet through the US -British and Australian Three -Party Security Agreement, you can determine that the United States is violating the nuclear non -diffusion weapon treaty.

In addition, the United States has never had a promise of "not using nuclear weapons first". The draft document documents originally had this one, and it was later deleted. Therefore, the meeting did not have the final documents, and the United States was more responsible. The United States only has an impulse to hegemony, there is no concept of common security, and there is no habit of multilateral cooperation.

Direct news: The Ministry of National Defense said that if the country's obligation to perform nuclear non -proliferation, the Australian and American nuclear submarine cooperation plans should be revoked. What do you think?

Special commentator Chen Bing: Throughout the international community, Asian countries are regions with a lot of nuclear weapons. There are two main reasons. One is that the United States has completed two cycles of nuclear modernization. It is now in the third stage and will be basically completed in 2029. The US nuclear strike capacity can reach all corners of the world and is the leader of nuclear diffusion. The second is that under the demonstration of the United States, American allies are trying to have nuclear weapons, especially Australia, Japan, and South Korea. They are eager to develop and have nuclear weapons in the name of self -defense. Look, the threat of Asia's nuclear weapons is related to the United States. China must be vigilant and sound.

The first requirement made by China is that Australia and the United States will recover the AUKUS nuclear submarine cooperation agreement. The transfer of weapon -level nuclear materials involved has a serious risk of nuclear diffusion and will destroy peace and stability in the Asia -Pacific region. The second requirement made by China is to hope that Japan and the United States will not engage in the so -called "nuclear sharing". In recent years, Japan has repeatedly proposed to achieve "nuclear sharing" with the United States. There are also nuclear weapons. China also proposed a warning to pay attention to the cooperation between the US and South Korea nuclear weapons.

South Korea also wants to have nuclear weapons. Or the U.S. military re -deploy nuclear weapons in South Korea. The reason why the United States has spread in the Asia -Pacific region is in its "Indo -Pacific Strategy" framework, forming a military encirclement against China, and it is also a nuclear siege. It not only threatened China's security, but also threatened Asia -Pacific security. If the United States wants to abide by the Treaty of Nuclear Real -diffusion of Weapons, then start with Asia, starting from the cancellation of Australian and British nuclear submarine cooperation, and never negotiate the "nuclear sharing" of the United States and Japan. Starting, starting from promising "not using nuclear weapons first".

Author 丨 Chen Bing, special commentator of Shenzhen Satellite TV "Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan"

Edit 丨 Liu Liping, Shenzhen Satellite TV Direct News

- END -