How to carry out the college entrance examination review papers?Take you to visit the Sichuan review paper scene!

The online evaluation work of the college entrance examination in our province began on June 9th, and the current work is proceeded smoothly as planned. Candidates are very concerned about what kind of way of reviewing their answers, and how can the quality of the papers control? In order to enhance the understanding of candidates and parents on the online evaluation work of the college entrance examination of our province, Sichuan Chuan takes everyone into the evaluation field today to understand the evaluation of the review!

Prepare for the papers, do it carefully!

In fact, before the official start of the papers, a large number of preparations need to be done:

First, refine and improve the work rules of the papers. According to the new national education examination online evaluation documentation of the National Education Examination this year, combined with the actual situation of our province, we will refine and improve the work rules for the online evaluation of the province's ordinary college entrance examination. Second, carefully organize personnel training. Organized a mobilization meeting for evaluation work, and organized all reviewers for business training and confidentiality education. The main content of business training is the provisions of the papers, the procedures for evaluation, and the online evaluation operation. After the training, the assessment was also organized to pass the assessment to participate in the evaluation papers. Third, carefully formulate the rules for implementation of the score. Organize the review of the expert group to carefully study the test questions and scoring reference, accurately grasp the intention of proposition, and based on a large number of candidates' answers, after full discussion, determine the scientific and reasonable and operable "Rules of the Rating of the Rating", and let each evaluation papers be allowed Teachers are proficient in the scoring standards of this group. Finally, strictly organize trial evaluation. Before the formal evaluation, conduct a trial evaluation. Through the trial evaluation, comprehensively understand the candidates' answers, and improve the score rules and standards. Through the trial evaluation, the teacher urges the teacher to master the scoring standards to ensure the stability of the quality of the papers.

Teacher reviews, strictly selected and hired!

At the Sichuan Normal University evaluation field, indoor and outdoor were quiet. Each review teacher faced the computer screen at a loss, and carefully reviewed the test papers that had been scanned into images.

This year, our province strictly selected and hired standards, strictly controlled the entry level, and carefully selected more than 3,000 reviewers to conduct evaluation work. Teachers are mainly from colleges or middle school teachers. They are familiar with the requirements of discipline teaching and examination content. They have basic skills of computer operation, good political ideas, strong discipline and responsibility, and no close relatives participate in this year's college entrance examination. For those who have a large score and strong subjectivity, the reviewing teachers such as composition, discussion questions, calculation answers, experimental questions and other questions must also have relevant conditions: middle school teachers must teach for more than three consecutive years and have intermediate levels with intermediate levels and have intermediate levels. High school full -time teachers with above titles; college teachers must have more than three years of teaching, teaching and research experience, and certain evaluation experience, and have intermediate and above titles. For the leader of the subject evaluation team, it is required to be more than seven years of teaching, teaching and research experience, and undergraduate college teachers with associate professors and above.

Evaluation venue, closed and safe!

When I walked into the West China Normal University, I only heard a mouse clicks. The teacher's eyes stared at the computer screen while litting the mouse to give the candidate answers to score. The computer table was at a glance without any unrelated supplies.

The evaluation field is fully closed management. All reviewers and staff members and staff will use work cards and face recognition identity to certify the entry and exit evaluation field. There is a deposit cabinet on the first floor of the evaluation paper. Except for the uniform office supplies issued by the papers, all items including mobile phones, bags and other items must not be brought into the evaluation work site; all the video surveillance equipment is installed in the workplace of the evaluation papers. There is no dead angle video throughout the process, and a wireless signal shielding system is installed to ensure the safety of the evaluation. All staff participating in the papers signed a commitment to security confidentiality, promising to strictly abide by the requirements of the college entrance examination evaluation papers.

While strict management, the evaluation points strive to create a good environment for review. After the teacher leaves every day, the logistics staff will disinfect and ventilate the machine room to ensure the physical and mental health and life safety of the teacher during the epidemic.

The quality of the papers, multiple guarantees!

The province's college entrance examination papers this year use a variety of mechanisms to ensure the quality of the papers:

The first is a random mode. The online review papers are based on the computer and network system. When the reviewers issued a request on the computer terminal, the evaluation system will automatically extract a teacher from the candidate answering image information library that has been scanned and collected. The candidate answering the image information of the candidate was distributed until the review terminal of the teacher's evaluation, and the evaluation of the teacher carefully reviewed the image information of the student's answer. Anyway outside.

The second is quality control. Before the formal evaluation, the discipline group of the review and guidance committee will determine the "set threshold" of the topic (the maximum range allowed by the two reviewers to score, and the threshold of objective questions is 0). In the evaluation papers, each question is scored separately by the two reviewers. The score difference between the scores of the two evaluation teachers is called "dual evaluation difference". During the scoring process, when the dual evaluation value is less than or equal to the dual -evaluation setting threshold, the average score of the computer automatically takes the score of the two -digit score teacher will be the final score of the question. When the dual evaluation difference exceeds the set threshold, the review system automatically distributes the candidate's answer image information to the third evaluation teacher score, which is called "three evaluations". If the two scores between the three scores and the dual evaluation are less than or equal to the dual evaluation setting threshold, the average score of the two scores with a small difference between the automatic difference of the evaluation system is used as the final score of the question; The difference between the difference between the dual score is less than or equal to the dual evaluation setting threshold, and the average score of the two scores with a small difference between the automatic difference of the evaluation system is the final score of the question; if the three scores and the two scores of the dual evaluation are The difference exceeds the dual evaluation setting threshold, and the subject group is submitted to the subject group experts for the final evaluation by the evaluation system, and the final evaluation score is used as the final score of the question. The third is strict standards. Adhere to the principles of "giving reasoning, deducting scores, and strictness, and tightness, a ruler to the end" to prevent the front of the front loosening, tightness, and looseness. Under the guarantee of various mechanisms, monitoring the entire process of evaluation, the quality inspection team, the subject team leader, and the team leader of each discipline can monitor, supervise, and remind the quality of the evaluation of the scrolls of the teachers through the evaluation quality control system. The subject quality inspection team conducted a random spot check on the answer sheet. The random inspection was not less than 20%of the total number of answers. The evaluation system can also display the scoring curve of each evaluation teacher. Through the evaluation system, the scoring results of the scoring teachers are tracked and compared to achieve real -time supervision and effective control of the entire process of evaluation.

川 Source of this article: Sichuan Education Examination Institute

- END -