Social Comment: The United States has lived as its own "most annoying" look

U.S. President Biden signed the "2022 Chip and Science Act" on August 9, which is often called the "chip bill", which makes it formal law. The bill has been brewing for a long time, and has long occupied the focus of public opinion in the United States for a long time. It is still passed in the case of the two parties in the United States and serious opposition. The party is one of the few consensus.

As the name suggests, two parts of the "2022 Chip and Science Act" are chips, and the second is science. The bill will provide more than $ 52 billion in government subsidies for the research and production of US semiconductors, and will also provide investment tax for chip factories. The bill also authorizes about $ 200 billion to promote scientific research and innovation in various fields such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing in the next 10 years. These seem to be an ordinary legislation that attracts investment promotion with preferential policies, but many of the terms clearly limit the restrictions on normal economic and trade and investment activities in China to carry out normal economic and trade and investment activities in China, which is a problem.

Some American media use "the most" to describe the "chip bills" with thousands of pages. For example, "one of the most important and far -reaching bills in the history of the United States in history", "The U.S. government has the most important industrial policy for decades Intervention, which is called "pioneering legislation". Where is the "pioneering"? That is, the United States picked up the industrial policy that had been severely criticized, and it also added a large number of unilateral administrative intervention in global markets, setting up trade and technological barriers, and continuously put economic and scientific and technological issues generally politically and pan -security.

When the United States accuses others of always a "righteousness" face, it is so natural to do it by itself. The 180 -degree change in the attitude towards industrial policy also shows that the United States can immediately live as its "most annoying" look.

Some people say that the "chip bill" is the product of the American version of the "national system". It should be emphasized that it is fundamentally different from that of China's "national system" that is based on the self -reliance of science and technology. One of the key directions of the "Chip Act" is the stumbling of potential competitors, reflecting the humble psychology caused by the increasing unconfidence in the United States in the face of China. It is a bit like a classmate in the class to review and prepare for the exam, but one of them has a bad eye, pulling the electric gates of other students at home, so that they cannot read books at night. Win a relatively competitive advantage for yourself. Of course, the specific practices of the United States should be worse and more domineering.

It is very "coincident" that Washington passed and signed this bill, and the time point just fell in the "Chip Quartet Alliance" consultation meeting it pushed. Small circle. Whether it is a bill or an alliance, there are strong coercion that requires the "selection station" between China and the United States. In a sense, they have exceeded the category of supporting policies for ordinary industrial, and they are more like a set of combined fists that Washington made to "choke the throat of China's development", showing a strong geopolitical color.

Obviously, Washington has tried to occupy the advantages of the global semiconductor industry chain through these actions, and to maximize the development and progress of China's semiconductor industry. However, its result is actually doomed since Washington's thoughtful thoughts. These expectations will eventually fail, and it is necessary to violate their wishes. Because the United States cannot essentially a "chip bill" that is essentially a "zero -sum game" closed and conservative thinking, in the era of economic globalization and free trade, it is destructive to reconstruct the global semiconductor industry structure that was originally dominated by the market.

For China's semiconductor industry, it may be negatively affected by the "chip bill" in the short term, but it is not decisive because it will inspire China's independent innovation to have stronger explosive power and lasting motivation. In recent years, there have been many cases in this area. Washington has made a bill, which can make the Chinese semiconductor industry stagnate or even retreat. Today, the arrogant American politician dare not think so.

The chip industry is highly globalized. In the past few decades, the global division of labor system and huge market demand are the fundamental conditions for the rapid progress of chip technology. Nowadays, the United States wants to engage in camps in the chip field, and artificially peels the world's largest market in the world from the industrial chain. This approach not only harms others, but also digs a new pit for the world. Obviously, the effectiveness of the "chip bill" is the retrogression of history.

- END -