United States: Reversing ~ Please pay attention ~ reverse ~ Please note

Author:Global Times Time:2022.06.25

On the evening of June 24, Beijing time, the Supreme Court of the United States made a historic ruling that made the entire United States fall into a vibration and division. The US Supreme Council originally ruled that the abortion rights that American women enjoyed the constitutional protection within 24 weeks before pregnancy have been overturned by the six conservative judges of the Supreme Court in the Supreme Court.

Although the religious forces and conservative forces in the United States rejoicing this ruling and believed that the "human rights" that protect the embryo, from the perspective of more American media and the public It is a historical reverse.

However, from the latest reports of the American media, the Supreme Court abolished the protection of the constitution to abortion rights, and I am afraid it is just the beginning. Because a conservative judge who participated in this ruling has clearly pointed out that the legal logic behind this ruling is also applicable to overthrowing the other three other important rights for the protection of the Constitution.

According to the United States "New York Times" and the Washington Post, although the US Supreme Court stated in the legal opinion of the abolition of the Constitution's abolition of the protection of women's abortion rights, today's ruling is only aimed at the 1973 abortion right jurisprudence, not Clarenos Thomas, one of the six conservative judges who support the abolition of the concept of abortion rights, said that the legal logic of this ruling can also be used to overthrow The U.S. Supreme Court has previously made a ruling about three other important rights in Americans.

The three rulings were the ruling of the context protected by the Constitution in the 1965 Supreme Court. The same -sex behavior made in 2003 was protected by the Constitution, and the ruling of the Constitution protected by the Constitution in 2015.

Public information on the US network shows that although in the American Constitution, the rights involved in the above three cases are not in the scope of protection that they are clearly mentioned, but most of the three judges who have made these three rulings believe that These rights are included in the scope of the rights of the United States Constitution.

However, Thomas, a "original manner" of the American Constitution, believes that these three rulings are the same as the context protection of the female abortion rights made by the Supreme Court in 1973. Expansion and random expansion of the basic rights of constitutional protection.

Therefore, he believes that since the Supreme Court of the United States has "corrected" the "error" in 1973, the Supreme Court should also re -consider three rulings in 1965, 2003 and 2015, and said that "correcting the previous mistakes was the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court. Responsibilities.

However, on the American public opinion field, which has exploded due to the abortion rights that have lost the constitution, this view of Thomas is tantamount to oil on the fire. On social networks, many US netizens are rebuked Tomas. This is to keep the history of the United States. Some people are excited to scold him and even other conservative judges.

Even the US President Biden was scared by his position, saying that the US Supreme Court led by conservative judges such as Thomas is bringing the United States to an extreme and dangerous road.

It is worth mentioning that there are some private "grudges" between Biden and Thomas.

When Thomas was just nominated as the Supreme Court of the Supreme Court in 1991, he once faced the allegations of sexual harassment. At that time, the hearing of Thomas nominated at the US Senate was the then Senator of the US Tellawa. Although Thomas finally passed the hearing and insisted on denied his sexual harassment of the woman, saying that it was a political persecution of him, but Biden not only voted for Tomas, but also proposed a series of aggressive aggressive at the meeting. question.

Later, in 2019, Thomas expressed his dissatisfaction with Biden's approach in an interview in an American documentary, saying that Biden "didn't know what he was talking about."

- END -

Negotiation to the United States?Australian Prime Minister: I don't want to care ...

According to the Associated Press report on June 20, the outside world called on A...

The three major stock indexes in New York stock market rose significantly on the 15th

Xinhua News Agency, New York, June 15th (Reporter Liu Yannan) The three major stoc...