Whether the lane installation camera violates the rights and interests of neighbors

With the continuous enhancement of the people's self -prevention awareness, more and more people choose to install cameras in front of the house or around the house. However, neighborhood disputes caused by private cameras in life occurred from time to time.

Installing monitoring and communication at the door of his door has not results, neighbors sued

Li and Zheng lived in an old community in Tongchuan District, Dazhou City. Two are in the same alley and have been neighbors for many years. Li's house is near the lane channel, and Zhengmou's position is near the roadway.

In early 2021, Li considers that there are only elderly people and children in the family, and they will return only in the New Year. In order to facilitate the situation of the family, a 360 -degree high -definition camera was installed at the door and home. The camera can clearly shoot the entire roadway, including Zheng's door, which is also recorded. After less than 1 month of installation, the neighbor Zheng Mou came to the door and asked Li to demolish the camera. It turned out that Zheng found that Li's monitoring camera has been facing his door, and Zheng believes that Li did not communicate with him before the installation. privacy. Zheng repeatedly tried to communicate with Li, asking for adjusting the camera recording range. And Li believes that the camera was safe at his own door, and others had no right to interfere. Zheng was sued to the court and asked Li to demolish the camera and line.

Edge the decision of the Court of Personal Rights of the neighbors for demolition within a time limit

After hearing, the court believed that natural people enjoyed privacy, and the personal information of natural persons was protected by law. Personal information can be recorded in electronics or other methods that can be used alone or with other information to identify a variety of information about specific natural persons, including natural person biometric information, address, health information, and whereabouts. In this case, although the camera installed by Li was not directly taken in Zheng Mou's courtyard, the recording range included the entire lane of Zheng Mou's door. The lane road was used by Li and Zheng. The relevant information of relatives and friends in and out of the road can be left by Li. For personal interests, without Zheng's consent in advance, the recording retained Zheng's personal information lack of legitimacy, legitimacy and necessity, and his behavior has constituted infringement. Zheng asked Li to support the demolition of the camera. In the end, the court ruled that Li was demolished the camera within a time limit. After the verdict came into effect, Li dismantled the camera facing the gate of Zheng's house.

● Lawyer reminder

Citizens really need to install monitoring equipment to ensure the safety of their own and family members, such as the recording range exceeding their own area, and obtain the consent of the neighbor. Individual citizens should also strengthen the protection of privacy and personal information. If infringement is found, they can negotiate with the actor. Under the circumstances of negotiation, they can take up legal weapons in time to safeguard their rights and interests.

Wu Tong Sichuan Rule of Law Daily-Rule of Law Sichuan News Client Reporter Tan Bielin

- END -