Four years in defending their rights, 18 times in court!She finally waited for an apology

Starting from the "315" consumer rights day in 2018

We have reported many times

Nanjing McGig Optics Center

Illegal sales of corneal shaping mirrors

The corneal shaping mirror of more than 20,000 yuan, wearing the retina for two years! Judged!

20 times! McGeiger was punished!

After being judged by the court as fraud, he was punished again! McGeiger sued consumers to damage their reputation?

New punishment comes!

After wearing a Madig keratin molding mirror that year

Ms. Rong, Ms. Rong, the mother of the retina, the student Xiao Deng

I have been protecting their rights through judicial routes

recent

We got the news from the Qinhuai District Court in Nanjing

McGeiger Optics Center

The final trial was judged to apologize to Ms. Rong

In 2015, Ms. Rong, Nanjing City, spent more than 20,000 yuan, and gave her son Xiao Deng a corneal shaping mirror at the McGig Optics Center to correct myopia. Unexpectedly, the retina dropped off after wearing it.

After the inquiry of Ms. Rong, it was found that the McGig Optical Center not only did not have the quintestinal fusion of the corneal shaping mirror, but also the corneal shaping mirror she sold. Essence

After trial, the Nanjing Intermediate Court judged in March 2021 to operate three companies such as the "Nanjing Xinshikang", which operates the McGeiger Optics Center, constituted fraud. It should "refund one three" for Xiao Deng for a total of more than 90,000 yuan.

Subsequently, the Nanjing Qinhuai District Market Supervision Bureau and the Health and Health Commission also punished the McGeiger Optics Center's illegal operations, with a total of more than 900,000 yuan.

Ms. Rong told reporters that after querying the illegal behavior of the McGig Optical Center, she sent a reminder to the parents who also had a supporting film shaping mirror in the McGig test support film. If you have any questions, everyone should pay attention. "

Unexpectedly, Madig issued a "solemn statement" to this, calling Ms. Rong's rights protection behavior of "extortion."

What makes people even more unexpected is that McGeiger has been identified as "fraud" and still sued Ms. Rong to the court on the grounds of reputation infringement and claimed 100,000 yuan. In the end, Madig's prosecution was rejected by the court.

Ms. Rong was very angry about Madig's approach. In August 2021, she once again prosecuted the McGeiger Optics Center's operating company and asked to apologize to the direction. After trial, the Nanjing Intermediate Court recently made a judgment to determine the so -called "solemn statement" issued by Madig's release, which harmed Ms. Rong's reputation right, requested Ms. Ms. Rong to "apologize in writing" and compensate the spirit of consolation of three thousand yuan. Yuan.

After the verdict, the McGeig Glory Center sent a "apology letter" to Ms. Rong, a "apology letter", acknowledging her "improper words".

"From the social responsibility, it is not only to apologize for me, but also deeply reflect on her mistake." Ms. Rong said.

Since the first prosecution in 2018, Ms. Rong has been in defending their rights for more than four years, and she finally discusses her son Xiao Deng and herself justice.

"A total of four lawsuits were hit, and each time after the first trial, a total of 18 times appeared in court."

After treatment, the retina has restored part of the function, but both life and learning have been affected. This makes the mother very worried. Concentrated. "

Ms. Rong was not satisfied with the "apology letter" of the McGig Optical Center, and she had proposed to the court to review the content of the other party's apology. Regarding the judgment, the reporter also contacted the person in charge of the operator of the McGig Optics Center, and the other party replied that "it was inconvenient to respond."

More than four years have passed

The matter finally has the last statement

Consumers get compensation

Corporate illegal acts have been punished

Enterprise's slander to consumers is also corrected by the court

Hope to go through this judgment

McGeiger can truly reflect and operate according to law

At the same time remind the family

The supporting supporting film shaping mirror belongs to the three types of medical devices

It is the most risk -level medical device

If the match is improper

It is likely to cause harm to children with myopia

When parents test the supporting supporting film film shape mirror

Be sure to check the qualifications of the corresponding institution

Be sure to go to a regular medical institution

wx_fmt = png "data-nickname =" Jiangsu News "Data-ALIAS =" JSTVJSXW "Data-Signature =" Jiangsu Radio and Television Finance Media News Center, follow Jiangsu News!/>

"News 360"

Reporter of Jiangsu Radio and Television Finance Media News Center/ Zhang Qing Zhang Jian

Edit/ Puff

© Jiangsu News

focus on

- END -