False litigation behind the huge amount of funds crossing the bridge

Bridge funds are a fusion of short -term funds, and it is a funds relative to long -term funds. However, in order to achieve personal illegal purposes, they use funds to cross the bridge and carry out false lawsuits. In September 2021, the Cheng'an County Procuratorate of Hebei Province supervised a false lawsuit of 10 million yuan in accordance with the law. In June of this year, the court's retrial judgment terminated the original mediation letter and rejected suspected false lawsuits. On July 25, Cheng'an County Procuratorate transferred the suspects Cao, Zhang, and Qian to the public security organs for investigation. On August 4, the hospital held a press conference to report the case.

Ten million funds cross the bridge

Late the court really ruled

Cao Mou had a self -funded master crossing the bridge. In May 2018, Zhang and Qian Mou found Cao, and the two sides signed a bridge funds borrowing contract. The contract stipulates: Zhang and Qian and the couple borrowed 10 million yuan from Cao Mou as a bridge funds in their personal names. Eight relatives' equivalent properties are guaranteed.

Later, Cao borrowed 10 million yuan from his friend Li Mou. Li used his son's bank card to transfer 10 million yuan to Cao's bank card to inform Cao that when he repaid, he transferred the 10 million yuan to Handan Da Da Da Da to the Dato Handan Da Da Da Da Da to Handan Da Da Da Da. Tiandi Real Estate Co., Ltd. (pseudonym) provides bank account information. Cao Moundang will transfer to Zhang's bank card all about 10 million yuan.

Then, Zhang Mou transferred the money 7 times to the bank account of Handan Datian Di Real Estate Co., Ltd. in accordance with Cao Mou.

On May 28, 2018, Cao submitted an application for pre -property preservation to the Cheng'an County Court on the grounds that Zhang and Qian borrowed money. The next day, the court issued a civil ruling to a 2.5 million yuan of real estate in Handan City, the land and real estate worth 5 million yuan in Handan Dachen Co., Ltd. in Cheng'an County, and 8 such as Qianmou's mother Seven real estate worth 3.7 million yuan in the guarantor ruled the seizure.

On June 26, 2018, Cao Mou sued Zhang and Qian in Cheng'an County Court, asking the court to order the defendant Zhang and Qian to repay 10 million yuan in principal, repay the cost of 200,000 yuan in the bridge, and pay 100 liquidated damages of 100 damages. 10,000 yuan, pay the interest on 2%of the monthly interest to the actual date of repayment. At the same time, Cao requested the court to order Handan Dacuang Co., Ltd., the company's executive director and general manager Qian Mou Yi (Qian's father), and the relatives of Zhang and Qian's couple, and Fees, liquidated damages, and interest bearing the liability for repayment.

The Cheng'an County Court filed a case on August 23, 2018, and issued a civil mediation letter on September 28 of the same year. At this point, Cao Mou complained about Zhang and Qian's folk lending disputes.

There are other hidden emotions for private lending disputes

The masses report to the procuratorate

Based on the ruling made by "voluntarily reached and recognized by both parties, there is no objection", there should be no problem. However, on August 9, 2021, the Cheng'an County Procuratorate received a report from the masses, saying that Cao Mou and Qian Mou's civil loan disputes had other hidden feelings, which was a false lawsuit. The Procuratorate of the hospital immediately filed a case after discussion, and the second procuratorial department of the hospital was involved in the investigation.

The prosecutor handling the case consulted a large amount of information about the bridge funds and organized several special seminars. It was believed that the investigation of the case must seize the bridge fund contract, the fund transfer voucher, and the actual capital of the funds. Funding bridge nodes, funds processing in the bridge, funds crossing the bridge, and the capital bridge.

During the review of this amount, the prosecutor handling the case found doubts: when the use of the capital bridge was revealed, it was found that in the bank account of Zhang and Qianmou, this fund was never used for business funds. There is also no bank borrowing, which is empty for funds; when the funds are checked in the process of the bridge, they found that Cao transferred to Zhang from the 10 million yuan borrowed from Li Mou, and Zhang immediately transferred to Handan Datian Di Real Estate Co., Ltd. The account number is the funding of funds; check the fall point of the capital bridge, and find that Li and Handan Datian Di Real Estate Co., Ltd. have funds. There is no connection between Cao, Zhang, Qian and Datian Di Real Estate Co., Ltd. The intersection is unnecessary to transfer; then trace the funds to the bridge node, and find that Zhang and Qian are being entangled by another civil loan lawsuit at this time, facing a ruling.

Suspecting false lawsuits

The Prosecutor's Prosecutor's Prosecution Proposal was issued after discussions

After further investigation by the Cheng'an County Procuratorate, it was finally discovered that the hidden greasy behind the case was discovered. It turned out that in March 2018, Zhang and Qian were also sued to Handan Handan District Court because of the 10.42 million yuan cross -bridge funds. It is still a relative of Handan Dacuang Co., Ltd. and Qian Mou's mother. However, the Hanshan District Court first mediates the repayment of the legal procedure, and the property will be seized if it is not implemented.

On March 14, 2018, the Hanshan District Court opened the trial. The original and defendants voluntarily reached a mediation agreement and issued a civil mediation letter. On July 23 of the same year, in view of the defendant Zhang and Qian's ignoring the mediation and did not perform the civil mediation letter, the court also issued a ruling: the defendant Zhang, Qian Mou, and Handan Dacuang Co., Ltd., Qianmou's mother, etc. Human real estate.

However, when the Hanshan District Court implemented a ruling, it was found that the property and all the guarantee of the guarantor had been made by the Cheng'an County Court, so the ruling was suspended. The Procuratorate of the Cheng'an County Procuratorate discussed that although Cao and Zhang and Qian signed a loan contract, Cao Mou used the borrowing funds to provide Zhang and Qian in accordance with the borrowing contract. The bank transfer vouchers formed in the revolution, the fact that the fictional bridge funds borrowing, filed a lawsuit to the Cheng'an County Court and reached a mediation agreement, seriously damaged the judicial authority and judicial credibility, and harmed the national interests and social public interests. It was a false lawsuit. As a result, the court put forward the retrial prosecution proposal to the Cheng'an County Court.

The Cheng'an County Court received a ruling on September 24, 2021 after receiving the retrial procuratorial suggestions from the procuratorial organs.

On June 24 this year, the Cheng'an County Court opened the trial of the trial, and the decision to terminate Cao Mou's civil mediation letter in the case of Zhang and Qian. Rejected the application for pre -litigation property preservation and cancel the seizure of the property of the guarantor.

On July 25, the Cheng'an County Procuratorate transferred the criminal suspect Cao, Zhang, and Qian to transfer the clues of the crime of suspected false lawsuits to the public security organs for further investigation.

According to the responsibility of "who law enforcement, who picked the law", on August 4, Cheng'an County Procuratorate held a special press conference on the case to report the investigation process, investigation results, case progress, and judicial use. More than 50 people in the Municipal People's Congress, members of the CPPCC, and more than 100 million yuan in enterprise, well -known entrepreneurs, and relevant functional department representatives held a symposium to jointly discuss how to strengthen the standardized management of bridge funds.

(Source: Procuratorate Author: Zhao Zhou)

- END -