The Supreme Law Release Protecting the Legal Rights Category Guidance Cases

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, July 6 (Reporter Qi Qi, Luosha) The Supreme People's Court released a total of 7 instructive cases of the 32nd batch on the 6th, mainly to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the workers for the people's courts at all levels. Refer to the case.

Guidance Case No. 179 "Nie Meilan sued Beijing Lin's Brothers Culture Co., Ltd. Confirmation of Labor Relations Case". The case is based on the essential elements as the judgment standard. The nature of the contract content signed by the employer and the employer to determine the nature of the rights and obligations signed by the employer and the employer to determine the labor relationship between the two parties, and prevent the employer from using the advantages to establish other contracts through other contracts. Methods cover up the practical use of work, disguise the legal rights given to workers in disguise, and achieve the purpose of better protecting the legitimate rights and interests of workers.

Guidance Case No. 180 "Sun Xianfeng sued Huai'an West District Human Resources Development Co., Ltd. labor contract dispute". In this case, the judgment criteria of the employer's unilateral relief of the labor contract behavior will help the employer to abide by the principles of honesty and facilities, which is conducive to protecting the legitimate rights and interests of workers, and has positive significance for building a harmonious labor relationship.

Guidance Case No. 181 "Zheng Mouje Honeywell Automation (China) Co., Ltd. labor contract dispute". After the implementation of the Civil Code, the employer rationally builds a sexual harassment prevention and disposal mechanism, effectively enhances the awareness of the entire staff, and effectively prevents the sexual harassment behavior of the workplace. It has certain demonstration and guiding significance.

Guidance Case No. 182 "Peng Yuxiang sued Nanjing Urban Construction and Development (Group) Co., Ltd. to pursue labor remuneration disputes." This case has a positive effect on regulating the autonomy of employer employment and guiding employers in the process of labor contract performance, and establishing a harmonious, stable, and benign interaction labor relationship.

Guidance Case No. 183 "Fang Ji Cost of the Labor Contract Dispute Case of China Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Metropolitan Society. This case has guiding significance for the people's court's trial of the year -end award, and preventing employers from violating the legitimate rights and interests of workers by the name of the rules and regulations.

Guidance Case No. 184 "Ma Xiaonan sued Beijing Sohu New Power Information Technology Co., Ltd. Competition Restricted Disables". In this case, the issue of restrictions on competition has been regulated, which effectively guarantees the right to choose the right to choose from workers.

Guidance Case No. 185 "Yan Jialin sued Zhejiang Sheraton Resort Co., Ltd. Equal Employment Rights Dispute Case". This case has guidance for the people's court correctly identifying employment discrimination in the dispute between equal employment rights, accurately grasping the relationship between corporate employment autonomy and equal employment rights of workers.

- END -