The dean's case of handling the case was the first to open the court in the court to mediate

In order to give full play to the leading role of the president of the court, and promote the deep and practical activities of the "capacity building year" activity, on the afternoon of July 28, Yan Ming, secretary of the party group and dean of the Jinshui Court of Zhengzhou City, opened the online public through the "Cloud Court" online. The trial was tried to return a case of defense liability for retrial, and the case was formed in court. It took only 15 days from the return to the rebuke to the reconstruction to the mediation case. This efficient and convenient treatment played a promotion of the optimized business environment and achieved good legal effects and social effects.

In 2019, a company in Tianjin signed a "Association Contract" with a business company in Henan, stipulating that a company in Tianjin used a venue and related facilities in a commercial company in Henan, and engaged in operating activities in the name of a business company in Henan. A business company pays for pay. During the performance of the contract, a dispute between the two parties caused the contract to fail to continue to perform. A company in Tianjin claims to the Jinshui Court to lift the contract, return the payment and deposit.

According to the court's judgment, the "joint contract" of the two parties was terminated, and a business company in Henan returned a company to a company in Tianjin. Later, a company in Tianjin had arranged for employees to go to a business company in Henan to retrieve the stored goods and found that the goods were lost. They also sued the Jinshui Court to ask a business company in Henan to return the goods with more than 120,000 yuan, and it also returned the display props worth more than 120,000 yuan, and it was worth more than 120,000 yuan. Compensation goods lost more than 1.356 million yuan. The Jinshui Court made the first trial judgment and rejected a lawsuit of a company in Tianjin. A company in Tianjin refused to accept the first trial judgment to the Zhengzhou Intermediate Court. Yanyan was hosted by Yan Ming.

After getting the case of the case, Yan Ming reviewed the original trial file and related case files for the first time, determined the idea of ​​the case for mediation, and organized the mediation work of the case many times. Considering the recent changes in the prevention and control situation of the epidemic, combined with the plaintiff's residence in the case in Tianjin, and the actual situation of its acting lawyer in Beijing, in order to facilitate the parties to litter, in the case of soliciting the opinions of both parties, Yan Ming promptly adjusted the offline meeting meeting to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to the prefabricated meetings to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to be adjusted to the offline court to the pre -court meeting to the offline court. On online meetings, the parties avoid running a trip and reduce the parties' complaint. During the trial, under his auspices, all links were conducted in an orderly manner. Considering that the case is a dispute among enterprises, properly handling the significance of the future operations of the two parties in the future. On the basis of the facts of the investigation, Yan Ming once again organized the mediation between the two parties. There are difficulties in operations, understand each other, resolve the contradictions between each other as soon as possible, light up to the battlefield, and actively invest in future operations.

After Yan Ming fully posted the facts, evidence, and interpretation, the two sides eventually reached an agreement on the court under the presence of the court. The defendant compensated the plaintiff 120,000 yuan within 5 days. The case resolved the contradiction between the two sides in time and reduced the burden on the corporate.

The dean's return to the judge's identity opened the trial of the trial, giving full play to the "leading geese" effect, played a good role in demonstration and leading role, and set an example for the entire hospital and encouraged morale. In the next step, the Jinshui Court will continue to give play to the judicial functions, pay close attention to the improvement of the quality and efficiency of the trial, and strive to make the people feel fair and just in each judicial case, and provide a stronger and stronger rule of law for the stable and healthy development of the regional economy, the social harmony and stability of the social harmony and stability Assure. (Chen Mengjiao, a correspondent Wang Xiaolei, a reporter from Henan Legal Daily)

- END -