On ｜ How can you blame others for "perfect rescue" when rescue people are rescued by car accidents?

Recently, an accident rescue video caused controversy on the Internet. According to reports, at the Guigang section of the Guangxi highway in Liubei, the door was locked after an accident occurred. The three were trapped in the car. A large number of netizens praised the enthusiastic helping parties, but the rescuers were also accused by some netizens or even online storms. Subsequently, in response to the relevant online storm speech, a total of 102 comments were cleaned up in the short video platform, and 11 accounts were disposed of.

Some netizens are angry with the rescuers why they have not smashed the window in time, why do they want to shoot videos to waste time, and why are they shouting instead of rescue? Why is there any people in the car "seeing death and not saving"? Later, the parties also explained that they did not smash the window because they were worried about someone in the back row, and the video was to record the scene. The "not -." The personal rescue ability was limited and needed to help. As for "seeing death and not rescue", in fact, it is precisely "seeing death cannot be saved". At that time, they repeatedly tried to rescue the unsuccessful rescue. When the vehicle had been on fire and might explode at any time, it was a last rescue. Even the sister of the victims responded afterwards: the driver who saved people did his best, hoping that his sister would walk quietly ...

A small number of netizens feel that the woman died in a car accident and hoped that the trapped in the car accident could be understood, but they could not be the reason to accuse the rescue. For Internet storms, they may not be aware that they are becoming a member of the Internet violence, and they may even think that they are "righteousness" for the dead. However, in other ways, it is generally urgent to see righteousness. It is difficult to consider and plan the rescue plan. Therefore, it is not possible to request and blame the rescuers in accordance with the common circumstances.

"Seeing death and can't be saved" is very torment for every rescuer who has the courage to reach out. At the rescue site, they took the risk to come forward and gamble on each other at all. As Mr. Zhao said, "I am very heartbroken and uncomfortable on the road." If I do n’t understand the situation, I blame the rescuers to ask them with the standard of perfect rescue. This is the latter. It is an unfairness and enthusiasm for public rescue.

It is worth noting that this happened for the first time. A few days ago, a video of "the patient's life was in danger when rescue the mobile phone" attracted attention. Some netizens criticized the nurse who "lived a life at all times". Later, things reversed. Colleagues assist in rescue. This kind of fact has repeatedly proved that netizens "not necessarily do not necessarily be real", and simply may not be able to fully understand and judge the situation at the time from the screen. Netizens cannot blindly conclude by the video content, and even deny the enthusiasm of rescuers for rescue.

To cherish goodwill can you inspire good deeds and make good deeds. In the legislation, the corresponding laws such as the Civil Code stipulate the corresponding exemption clauses. If the rescue behavior is caused by voluntary emergency rescue behavior, the rescue person shall not bear civil liability. This kind of "good person clause" aims to avoid the worries of "troubles" for those who see righteousness. It is reflected in the values, that is, it is hoped that through legislation, the value leadership is achieved, and the unprecedented blame for seeing the righteousness is to maximize the real worries of good people to fight for righteousness. A few netizens who blame the rescuers may wish to read the original intention of this legislation with their heart. (Han Zongfeng)

- END -