Only when you return to the "1992 Consensus" can we truly maintain the peaceful development of cross -strait

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the "1992 Consensus" on both sides of the strait. The 30th anniversary of the "1992 Consensus" was recently held in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. Public opinion in Taiwan pays great attention to this. Many mainstream media in Taiwan have published a comment article that today, when cross -strait relations are tight and turbulent, reviewing the future of the "1992 Consensus" and looking forward to cross -strait relations is of great significance to maintaining the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait. Many island experts and scholars and people of insight also said that the "1992 Consensus" laid the foundation for the peaceful development of cross -strait relations. The party factions in Taiwan must look at the "1992 Consensus" and promote cross -strait exchanges and cooperation.

"1992 Consensus" is the key to improving cross -strait relations

In response to the 30th anniversary of the "1992 Consensus" on the mainland, Taiwan's "Wang Pao" published a social comment that compatriots on both sides of the strait were the same as the root, the same text, and the same article. Destiny community. Today, when the situation of the Taiwan Strait is intense and turbulent, the two sides of the strait especially need to continue the spirit of seeking common ground while shelving the differences, establish a consensus between peace and communication, and take communication and cooperation as the common goal.

Social comments said that 30 years ago, cross -strait relations had not yet gone out of the shadow of the Cold War, but the two parties still overcome difficulties and sat down to talk, and finally found the intersection, laying the foundation of the "Wang Gu talks" and the systemicization of the Taiwan Sea Foundation and the Taiwan Sea Foundation. Therefore, in 1992, the cross -strait negotiation and consensus in the complex and difficult political situation was based on both parties' expectations for the peace and development of both sides of the strait. This is the original intention of the "1992 Consensus". Today, the DPP authorities should emphasize the original intention of the "1992 Consensus" to restore and promote cross -strait exchanges and cooperation to avoid cross -strait misunderstandings and misjudgment deepening.

According to Taiwan's "United Daily" analysis, a symposium on high -specifications on the mainland highlights the importance of the "1992 Consensus" as the political foundation of cross -strait. Wang Yang, chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, elaborated the mainland's policy on Taiwan at the symposium, and pointed out that the Chinese on both sides of the strait chose to replace the confrontation with dialogue 30 years ago, so they reached the "1992 Consensus". Datong, there are differences between cross -strait differences. " The hard -won results need to be maintained and cherished together on both sides of the strait.

Taiwan's "China Daily" published a social review entitled "The 1992 Consensus" is still the key to improving cross -strait relations. The article said that in 1992, the two sides of the two sides did reach a principled consensus on "one China". This is an objective fact that it cannot be wiped out nor deny. "1992 Consensus" is not a simple term, nor is it a text game. It is the key to improving cross -strait relations.

The mainland held a symposium on the original clear source and thought -provoking

People from all walks of life on the island also pay attention to the 30th anniversary of the "1992 Consensus" of the mainland. Ji Xin, a well -known unified scholar of Taiwan and the publisher of the "Observation" magazine, pointed out that whether from the historical documents of cross -strait, or from the background of the 1992 times, or from the perspective of the "Wang Gu talks" in 1993, the "1992 Consensus" Historical facts do not allow anyone to deny it, and there is no such thing as "one party is strongly accepted by the other party". She said that the leader of the Taiwan authorities Tsai Ing -wen refused to recognize the "1992 Consensus" after coming to power in 2016. In this context, the 30th anniversary of the "1992 Consensus" on the mainland has the original clear source and thought -provoking thoughtfulness. effect.

Hong Xiuzhu, former chairman of the Chinese Kuomintang and chairman of the Chinese Youth Goose Peace Education Foundation, believes that the "1992 Consensus" is the consensus that the two sides of the strait adhere to the principle of China and work together to seek the principles of national unity. The fact is the history of white paper and black. From 2008 to 2016, both sides of the strait acknowledged the "1992 Consensus". With such a mutual trust foundation, only the stage of cross -strait can enter the stage of communication, development, and cooperation. Business. "This is enough to prove that the Chinese on both sides of the strait have sufficient wisdom, and can properly resolve disputes and resolve disadvantages in a rational way without having to meet with force." She said.

Hong Xiuzhu said that cross -strait economic cooperation has become increasingly closer in 30 years. "There are two benefits between the two sides of the strait, and the two harms, and the role played by the" 1992 Consensus "is even more important." She looks forward to promoting various exchanges on the "1992 Consensus" on the two sides of the strait. The "1992 Consensus" on the two sides of the strait will continue to deepen the "1992 Consensus" to create a more favorable environment and conditions for peace and unification.

The party factions in Taiwan must look at the "1992 Consensus" positively

Zhang Ronggong, former deputy secretary -general of the Chinese Kuomintang, has long been the director of the Kuomintang Mainland Affairs Department, and is an important witness of the development and change of cross -strait relations. He said that since the Democratic Progressive Party came to power in 2016, he refused to recognize the "1992 Consensus". The cross -strait "exchanges" almost became "broken flow" and "dialogue" became "confrontation". This runs counter to the peaceful development of cross -strait relations on the two sides of the strait. Now the situation of the Taiwan Strait is tight and turbulent, and the key to hurting Taiwan is because the DPP authorities do not recognize the "1992 Consensus." Zhang Ronggong said that to return to the peaceful development of cross -strait relations, negotiating dialogue, and mutually beneficial cooperation, we must have a common political foundation. Only when you return to the "1992 Consensus" can you gain the prosperity of peace between the two sides of the strait and Taiwan.

Qiu Jinyi, former vice chairman and secretary -general of the Taiwan Sea Foundation, had personally experienced the "Wang Gu talks" of 1993. He believed that the "1992 Consensus" not only contributed to the "Wang Gu's talks", but also laid the foundation for the peaceful development of cross -strait relations. He called on some people on the island to "look back", trying to promote the gradual integration of the two sides of the strait and discuss the future. Former Changhua County Mayor Zhuo Boyuan also believed that the "1992 Consensus" laid the foundation for the peaceful development of cross -strait relations. He issued a post on social media that acknowledging the "1992 Consensus" is the prerequisite for ensuring the peaceful development of cross -strait sides of the strait. On the occasion of this sea soldiers, its importance is unspeakable and inestimable. He said that the "1992 Consensus" is a peaceful consensus, and the party factions in Taiwan must look at the "1992 Consensus" instead of doing it. He also called on the DPP authorities and the Kuomintang host that the well -being of the Taiwan people's well -being must be thought, abandoning ideological opposition, abandoning the attitude of playing with the text, and looking at the "1992 Consensus", restored the "1992 Consensus" as a The basis of restarting peaceful exchanges on both sides of the strait, turning crisis into opportunities, different management and control, equal negotiation, and promoting a win -win situation.

- END -