Yueyang Building District People's Court concluded the case of property disputes after divorce

Author:Hunan rule of law Time:2022.08.18

Can I still divide the housing collection for 20 years of divorce?

Yueyang Building District People's Court concluded the case of property disputes after divorce

Hunan Law Daily · New Hunan Client News (Correspondent Liu Ya Wang Chengfeng) After 20 years of divorce of the husband and wife agreement, can the act of re -dividing the house collection of houses be supported? Recently, the People's Court of Yueyang Building District, Yueyang City concluded a case of property disputes after divorce.

The court found that in 1991, the plaintiff Wu (pseudonym) and the defendant Liu (pseudonym) registered to marry. During the marriage duration, the two parties used working -age welfare to purchase a set of property and registered under the name of both parties. The two parties agreed to divorce in September 2000. The divorce agreement stipulates that "no husband and wife's common property, joint debt without husband and wife, and no other matters." In December 2021, the house was collected, and the cost of house demolition was nearly 400,000 yuan. Because the two parties have failed the distribution negotiation of demolition funds, Wu said to the court to confirm the property equity share of the house involved in the house.

During the trial of the case, the judge believed that the house involved was purchased by Wu and Liu during the marriage period. It was registered in the name of both parties. Property; and at the time of divorce, the two sides knew the existence of the house, and there was no time -effective issue in this case. The "non -common property and no common debt" clause stipulated in the divorce agreement has a variety of controversy in judicial cases.

In the end, the judge avoided the disputes to organize the mediation of the two parties many times. On the basis of clearing the common property of the house involved in the case, the house was fully considered by Liu during the divorce period. Opinions, unanimously agreed to compensate Wu Wu's 150,000 yuan in property division, and the mediation of this case was associated.

- END -