Express "inner ghosts" swallowed offer discounts, and accumulated more than 180,000 yuan to be sentenced

Justice.com Yangzhou, August 17 (Correspondent Jiang Hongwei and Zhou Ying) Two couriers used discount codes and virtual weight increases during the work of the courier company to invade the "difference" of the courier costs of more than 180,000 yuan. On June 16, a public prosecution was filed by the Procuratorate of the Yangzhou District of Yangzhou City, Jiangsu Province.

Ms. Liu runs a plush toy production company in Yangzhou and often needs to send products. One day in September 2017, Chen, a salesman of a logistics company, took the initiative to find Ms. Liu, hoping to seek cooperation. After comparing the price and convenience, Ms. Liu readily agreed to cooperate.

Since then, Chen and Hu have become the docking courier of Ms. Liu's company. Once they need to send the courier, Ms. Liu contacted Chen or Hu to pick up the parts, and said on the spot to scan the collection. The delivery fee is usually settled in the next month. Chen will send the bill to Ms. Liu. After checking it, they will be directly handed over to Chen through the way of WeChat, bank card or cash.

At the first checkout, Ms. Liu found that there was something strange on the bills, because the customer name showed "Li" on the bill, not the name of her company. Chen was vaguely stated that this was the encoding of the company's internal settlement. With Li's encoding, it did not affect Ms. Liu's business. After Ms. Liu checked the bill, she found that the amount was indeed correct, so she stopped. In this way, in the next few months, Ms. Liu's company always sent a logistics company in the name of "Li" in the name of "Li".

In order to develop the market, a logistics company that Chen worked for different customers launched different preferential plans for different customers. One of them provided customer information by the courier, estimated the customer's goods, and the company's headquarters calculated based on the volume of goods and product profit margins. Corresponding discount. The plan was originally attracted customers for the logistics company with a price advantage and conducive to the introduction of customers, but did not expect that Chen was drilled by Chen.

Chen applied for several discount codes with the identity information around his acquaintance. When talking about cooperation with customers such as Ms. Liu, the delivery cooperation plan is determined at a lower market price and a slightly higher quotation than the actual discount. In the subsequent delivery, Chen and Hu used the discount code applied in the name of others to obtain a low price discount. After that, the statement sent by the company to the customer will be sent to the customer. The mailing fee is charged, and the actual mailing postage is deducted to the company.

Not only that, Chen and Hu also increased the weight of the goods to conceal the "difference". In the logistics company, the zero head of the customer's goods is calculated according to the entry of the four houses and five. Chen and Hu not only concealed the offer from the customers, but also charged the customer's mailing fee from the customer in a calculation manner, but in the direction When the company reports the account, the calculation fee is calculated at the four houses and five incomes, so that they earn another "difference".

In this way, the two adopt discount codes and virtual weight increases, and the cumulative "difference" of more than 180,000 yuan will be based on themselves.

At the end of 2018, the financial staff of the logistics company went to the site of Chen and Hu to check it. It was found that the bill on the computer on the computer was inconsistent with the actual account amount in the company's system.

On April 18, 2022, the case was transferred to the Procuratorate of Lijiang District to filed a public prosecution. After the procuratorial organs were reviewed, Chen and Hu were employees of a logistics company. The property of the unit is illegal, with an amount of more than 180,000 yuan, a large amount. The behavior offends the provisions of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China and constitutes the crime of occupation. In May 2022, the Procuratorate of Lijiang District filed a public prosecution in accordance with the law. After trial, the court made the above judgment.

- END -