Classics commented: Keep the "money bag" to prevent false apps from touching fish in muddy water

Core point: Liang Yu, a commentator of China Economic Network, believes that Li Yan and Li Gui are difficult to distinguish, and the personal information is leaked lightly. It is necessary to make more approach and combined force to build personal information protection and property security barriers, so as not to allow criminals to have the opportunity to touch fish in muddy water.

Creative picture China Economic Net Zhou Yuanyuan produced

Science and technology are good, making life more and more beautiful; science and technology are evil, the first step deviates from the right way. Recently, scammers imitated platforms such as JD Finance, immediately finance, and 360 rendering to launch a large number of "Li Gui" APPs to implement fraud.

Judging from the data disclosed, such fraud is by no means a serious disaster area for telecommunications fraud. It is understood that telecommunications network fraud cases currently implemented through false apps account for more than 60%of all telecommunications network fraud cases. Since the beginning of this year, there have been as many as 42,000 counterfeit APPs that have been investigated by the National Internet Information Office.

Not every consumer can practice a pair of "fire eyes". These counterfeit APPs have similar signs and similar product introductions to regular apps, coupled with high -amount return bait, many consumers inevitably fall into the "trap". Li Yan Li Gui is difficult to distinguish, and the personal information is leaked lightly, and the property losses will be caused.

However, at present, the production and operation of counterfeit APP have formed a gray industrial chain. From writing program code, to buying domain names, rental servers, and the packaging and distribution of APPs, the division of labor and sales of science and technology criminals is clear, showing the characteristics of professionalization and professionalization. In addition, many IP addresses of counterfeit apps are abroad, which also brings great difficulties to regulatory supervision.

The network is not a place outside the law, and naturally behind the screen of the mobile phone, it should not be "pit" everywhere. Therefore, multi -pronged, combined with force is needed to build personal information protection and property security barriers, so as not to allow criminals to prevent the opportunity to touch fish in muddy water.

The popularity of counterfeiting APP is a kind of damage to the formal platform. At present, many application markets have set up internal review links, and some have "manual review" after "machine review". The question is that the current artificial audit generally only reviews the name and content of the content, and whether there are imitation of the app name, icon, and promotional language. Most of the application markets are negligible.

Therefore, for the application platform, it is necessary to strengthen the disposal of fraud information, continuously improve the technical and management methods, and make good review, registration, inspection, and monitoring obligations, and resolutely be a "doorkeeper". Genuine official app operators should strengthen monitoring. Once you find that imitation apps or web pages, you should report immediately, and issue prompts in time to prevent users from being fooled.

At the same time, relevant departments such as public security and online information should strengthen joint law enforcement, increase the rectification of industrial chains such as application markets, electrical sales, and SMS, and purify the market environment. Only by continuously strengthening the supervision of the matter and after the increasing cost of illegal, can the counterfeit APP have nothing to do.

Of course, for consumers, we must go to the snacks and keep their "money bags". From the perspective of the fraud method of counterfeiting APP, most of them are older. They often attract the attention of exaggerated content such as high quota, low interest, low interest, not checking credit, and fast accounts, and then perform fraud with multiple names such as membership fees, capital verification fees, thawing fees, and margins. For example, in June this year, Shandong consumers Qin applied for a loan of 100,000 yuan on the APP of "Financial", and was required to pay 10,000 yuan for financial loan insurance by the platform, otherwise it would not be withdrawn.

"There is no free lunch in the world." The majority of consumers still have to be vigilant, and don't be blinded by Xiao En Xiaohui. To download the APP through regular channels, do not easily believe in some unrealistic high -yield investment promotion, let alone transfer money to strangers easily. If you always imagine "low risk and high yield", it will naturally be harvested. (China Economic Network commentator Liang Yu)

Economic Daily-China Economic Network Review Theoretical Channel is open for submission. Original reviews and theoretical articles can be sent to CEPL#CE.CN (#to@). For details, please refer to Economic Daily-China Economic Network Review Theory Channel's Publishing Channel.

Related articles: multi -pronged approach, so that the "Li Gui" app has nothing

"Li Gui" and accomplice, all need to fight

- END -