He left, "Peter 2.0" is forever!Suberg evolution design guide, isn't it interested?

Author:Journal of China Science Time:2022.07.07

Wen | Pan Enrong (Professor of Marxism College of Zhejiang University)

Peter Scott -Morgan Picture Source: "Daily Telegraph"

Is anyone willing to transform themselves into Suberg? This was a question I came up with the movie "Alta" a few years ago.

In the movie, in order to capture Alta, the lord of the dungeon Gruchika is waiting for a major transformation, and his head and spine are hanging in the air. This looks a little ridiculous, but it is a bit terrible to think about it. Before we connected to the artificial body, the part that the person who must not be peeled in the end is a kind of "encephalon", like a big and small worm; after connecting the artificial body, people become Cyboger, who is super ability to exceed the best capabilities. Essence In other words, except for the brain that cannot be replaced, Siber can replace the other parts of the body to obtain new power or abilities.

But, you, me, and others, and others around you are willing to transform into Siboger like this? This problem has troubled me for a long time. Until I knew "Peter 2.0" -British scientist Peter Scott-Morgan announced his death on June 15, 2022. I realized that the answer to this question was yes. Although "Peter 2.0" died, he did open a new possibility for human life.

From machine substitution to machine -mocolticists

"Peter 2.0" is not the result of "machine substitution".

"Machine substitution" means that since the 1960s, the invention and use of modern machines have opened the climax of machine substitutions to promote the world's progress. At the beginning of the 21st century, deep learning technology promoted artificial intelligence to enter the third climax. The "secondary rise" of intelligent machines had a little "autonomy", and once again in -depth transformation of the "human and machine" relationship.

Regardless of whether the machine has undergone qualitative changes, or whether a strong artificial intelligence machine may occur in the future, the result of "machine substitution" is the main relationship between people and machines, or a "binary" relationship. However, "Peter 2.0" is different from the machine substitution.

From the perspective of technological development, "Peter X.0" is the result of "machine -based". If the traditional "machine substitution" is the machine intervention in the original "human and human" relationship and constitutes a new "man and machine" relationship, then "machine" is the "postponement of man" to intervene in human life itself and constitute "postponed humans". ——Serberg.

The machine of "Peter X.0" is part of the person, or people and machines are "unity". Scott -Morgan once thought so much in his early work "Robotic Revolution": "One day, humans will replace the fragile body with more lasting machinery and use super computers as intelligent amplifiers."

33 years later, in the face of the "Frozen disease" army, Scott -Morgan took the initiative to choose this day. "Peter 1.0" uses a mechanical machine to replace human organs. On July 10, 2018, Scott Morgan established a set of life maintenance systems for his body through "triple oral surgery".

At this time, "Peter 1.0" became the first Suberg -semi -robot, and "Peter 2.0" used intelligent machines to replace human organs.

On October 10, 2019, Scott -JP Morgan chose all -throat resection surgery, and then used various artificial intelligence technologies to achieve controllable electronic voice and digital human images. Suberg.

Eternal NPC

Many people may think that "Peter 2.0" has opened a possibility of "eternal life" for humans. After the death of Scott -JP Morgan, "Peter 2.0" became a "digital person" completely. It can exist permanently when other conditions are considering unchanged. So, what kind of "eternal life" is this? Is this the same as the "eternal life" pursued in our subconscious?

I think that the eternal life of "Peter 2.0" is not the "eternal life" we yearn for our subconscious. What is the difference between the two "eternal life"?

Take online games, or the movie "Out of Control Players" as an example. Our subconscious "eternal life" is the state of players. Players can re -enter the game after "death", even if they delete files, they can register to enter the game.

Unlike the player's "eternal life", the eternal life of "Peter 2.0" is the NPC (non -player's controllable character) in the game. It can be renewed after death. To put it simply, "Peter 2.0" is now an NPC of the real world, and you, he, and even all human beings are not players in the real world. We have only one life. Essence

Perhaps people who yearn for "eternal life" are going to be disappointed, but don't lose hope completely. Theoretically, if strong artificial intelligence is born, we may still get the "eternal life" state of lamenting in subconscious.

First of all, we must clarify where the difference between player eternal life and NPC -style eternal life. Both eternal ways of life have the permissions of the game scene. They also have "consciousness", which can at least show a conscious state. The difference between the two eternal ways is that players have "self -awareness", and NPCs are not -NPC cannot realize that they can show a conscious state.

Secondly, strong artificial intelligence theory can have "autonomous consciousness". This provides the possibility of our self -awareness of our dates after death. Finally, we need to find a reliable mechanism to download our "self -awareness" to strong artificial intelligence, or copy it to strong artificial intelligence. Of course, I think that the most likely mechanism is the combination of humans and strong artificial intelligence. Through the "October Wanderer" process, "born" a "self -consciousness" and "memory" artificial intelligence "autonomous consciousness" that inherits our "self -awareness" and "memory" Essence In other words, human beings obtain eternal life by "reproducing" the descendants of artificial intelligence.

Suberg X.0 Design Guide

Suberg is actually a personal enhancement model.

From "Peter 1.0" to "Peter 2.0", the design of Suberg reflects the following basic principles. First of all, Siber insisted on independent human consciousness. Secondly, Suberg can be enhanced based on the two dimensions of "body -mind". Third, according to the level of the machine, the machine technology spectrum that Suberg can use is functional tools, non -intelligent machines, weak artificial intelligence machines and strong artificial intelligence machines.

The design of Suberg must adopt the "object -oriented design method". For an independent Suberg object, it consists of "internal structure" and "external function", that is, the "body -mind" model. The body refers to the physical component that carries human life function. For example, Peter 1.0 is a part of the human body to achieve the ability to maintain the existence of life in the body of the human body; For example, Peter2.0 is to use artificial intelligence to be part of the human body to achieve social ability such as communication and decision -making.

According to the two design dimensions of the body and mind, as well as the technical spectrum of the machine, the possible types of Suberg X.0 are as follows:

Now we already know three types of Suber X.0. The Siberg B0.1 refers to the use of functional tools or components to equip people's body to recover or enhance people's ability. For example, Nel Harvezon is color blindness, and he equipped a color sensor in 2003 to help him perceive the color.

Siberg B1.0 refers to the body of the person with a complete machine. For example, a set of in vitro life maintenance systems on Peter 1.0, that is, the gastric oral surgery inserts the external catheter into the stomach to "eat and drink", colonic oral and bladder walted surgery will connect the external pipe to the colon and the bladder.

The Siberg M2.0 refers to the use of a complete weak artificial intelligence machine to equip people's body to recover or enhance people's communication and decision -making ability. For example, the text input system, electronic voice system, digital human system, and idea communication system on Peter2.0.

Other Siberx X.0 types have not yet appeared or made public, and we can make general inferring. Siberg M0.1 can be inserted into the memory chip through the brain interface to enhance people's memory capabilities; Suberg M1.0 can stimulate the brain area to relieve or overcome fear through the electric shock system; Even if people fall asleep, they can walk automatically.

One thing to note is that because the artificial intelligence system has certain "autonomy", Siberber X.0 may bring unexpected experiences or risks.

First of all, weak artificial intelligence machines may disagree with human consciousness. The electronic voice systems used by Peter2.0 and Hawking are weak artificial intelligence voice systems, but the effects of the two are different. Hawking has extremely high accuracy requirements for the electronic voice system, resulting in the slow speed of the Hawking control system input. However, Peter2.0 tends to interact more naturally with others. It can directly associate related but less accurate words, which will help improve the input speed.

Secondly, weak artificial intelligence machines may cause "extraordinary behavior" and cause bad consequences. When the Saiberg B2.0 is equipped with a "third hand" robotic arm, there may be behaviors that the parties cannot explain when doing certain sensitive behaviors. For example, when the woman's ups and downs, the robotic arm "more" touched two. The parties did not explain whether it was his behavior or a robotic arm anyway.

Third, if a strong artificial intelligence machine in the future appears, it may trigger the schizophrenia or be "grabbed" in the Suberg X.0. In theory, strong artificial intelligence can have "autonomous consciousness". If the Siberbg B3.0 is equipped with a strong artificial intelligence robotic arm, or the Suberg M3.0 is equipped with a strong artificial intelligence program, then Siber will have two "independent" consciousness as a whole -human self -consciousness -human self -awareness And the machine "autonomous consciousness". Perhaps humans can get along well with machines, but they may also become "conscious division" patients, or machine consciousness "grabbing" occupy the entire Subra.

Finally, a new prison system of "conscious cage" may occur in the future. The Siberg M1.0 uses a non -intelligent machine, that is, the possibility of "learning" or "evolution" has reached the possibility of matching the human mind. Then, this can realize the constraints or seal of human consciousness. Suberg M3.0 is more likely to use a strong artificial intelligence machine for a complete seal based on "learning" human mind. For example, in the game "Perfect World", the mentality of sealing human strong people with a spiritual cage is the most cruel eternal punishment.

"China Science News" (2022-07-07 3rd edition comprehensive)


Edit | Zhao Lu

Capture | Zhihai

/>

- END -

Reviewer article | turn "foreign customers" into "local enterprises"

Shanghai Merchant Ai Ming is one of the downstream customers of Shandong Yunrui New Materials Co., Ltd., but now it has settled in Zibo, becoming the chairman of Shandong Bokssel New Material Technolo

Shapingba District commemorates the 100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party's united front policy "Concentric Story"

Shapingba District commemorate the policy of the Communist Party of ChinaThe 100th...