[Solution] "Some countries try to hijack the international atomic energy institution", what's the matter?

Knight Island Press

Recently, the International Atomic Energy Agency Council Meeting was held in Vienna. A noteworthy news is that the Representative of the Permanent Representative of China and other international organizations in Vienna and other international organizations said that China "frustrated some countries to try to hijack the International Atomic Energy Agency Council."

Last year, the United States transferred nuclear submarine technology to Australia with the United Kingdom to "pry" the French nuclear submarine business. The island once wrote that this is actually a nuclear diffusion through the small circle alliance. ("Why did the Board of Board the British pry the nuclear submarine business of France?")

Internationally, prevent nuclear diffusion from returning to international atomic energy institutions. In order to make the contract "over the meeting", the United States, Britain, and Australia have done a lot of small actions in private. How did they do it? How can China frustrate its plot? We interviewed Ambassador Wang Qun.

Ambassador Wang Qun spoke at a meeting of the institutional council. Picture source: website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs

1. Xia Ke Island: Why does China highly care about the cooperation between the United States and Britain and the Australian nuclear submarines? How serious is the "tons of weapon -level nuclear materials" transferred to Australia?

Wang Qun: Since the reach of the United States and Britain and Australia's nuclear submarine is the first time the nuclear weapon country has publicized nuclear weapons materials for the first time since the reaching the "Non -diffusion Nuclear Weer's Treaty" (NPT). Not only the large number of outputs, in terms of concentrated uranium abundance, the United States and Britain directly exported more than 90 % of the weapon -level high -thick uranium to Australia, far exceeding its 3.67 % red line for Iran.

The nature of this matter is very serious, and it is a naked nuclear diffusion behavior. If it is not stopped in time, it will not be ruled out in the future, or even break through the threshold of the nuclear. China and the international community attach great importance to this, and relevant countries must never be destroyers and disableds of international rules.

2. Xia Ke Island: You mentioned in a public interview that the United States and Britain, Britain, and Australia, can "openly abducting agencies and contempt rules". Can they specifically talk about how they operate? What are the violations of?

Wang Qun: U.S., Britain and Australia submitted work documents for "Cooperation under AUKUS Partnership" to the Tenth Review Conference of the NPT, and then distribute non -documents to institutional member states, covering the essence of the nuclear diffusion with the "Navy Power Pack", and the illegal nuclear nuclear nuclear nuclear nuclear, and the illegal nuclear nuclear nuclear core The diffusion acts are packaged into legal and harmless behaviors and mislead the international community.

The Three Kingdoms also engaged in political manipulation, trying to coerce the International Atomic Energy Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "institution") Secretariat to propose a guarantee supervision plan, and then use the "small circle" and its own votes to forcibly promote the council to let the nuclear diffusion act legal legal. change.

In addition, the Three Kingdoms always refused to report the substantial progress of the cooperation of nuclear submarines to the institution on the grounds of "unstellically determined cooperation plan", so that the director and the secretariat could not submit a substantial report to the council.

The United States and Britain and Australia nuclear submarine collaboration first violates Article 1 and 2 of the Treaty of Non -diffusion of the Nuclear Weapons, that is, the "not directly or indirectly transferring nuclear weapons to any country", "not assisted, encouraged or guided any nuclear weapons -free countries to obtain in any way. Nuclear weapons, "Nuclear or indirectly accepted the control of nuclear or nuclear weapons from any exporting country" without nuclear weapons.

Secondly, the "Institutional Institutional Security Supervision Agreement" (CSA) violated the institution. As a nuclear weapon country, Australia did not report its nuclear materials inventory and nuclear facilities in time at all stages.

In the end, they also violated Article 2 of the institutional "Period" that "not to promote any military purposes".

US Navy "Virginia" class attack nuclear submarine (picture source: foreign media)

3. Xia Ke Island: We see that China has mentioned that "frustration of some countries' attempts to hijacking the council", can it be explained how the Chinese side is fighting?

Wang Qun: In September last year, the United States and Britain and Australia announced the launch of nuclear submarine cooperation. In November, China raised issues at the institutional council: "The transfer of nuclear materials involved in the cooperation of the United States and Australia nuclear submarine cooperation and its guarantee supervision of NPT" The purpose is to explore the appropriate guarantee supervision plan through the intergovernmental discussion process, and effectively solve the problem of the US -British and Australian nuclear diffusion.

So far, the relevant issues have been listed in the agency's agenda for four consecutive times in consensus, and have become issues that have consistent negotiations of council members. Before the council meeting was held, the United States once threatened to "break the issue of China", trying to hijack the council, use the director of the head of the heads, and put forward issues that are conducive to themselves.

However, at the just -concluded council meeting, the Director -General has maintained neutrality and fairness in procedure, and did not ask the topic of the United States and the United States and the United States and Australia. So the United States rushed directly to the front desk, proposed its own issues, and deliberately avoided the essence of illegal transfer of nuclear weapons materials in the Three Kingdoms.

There is also a small episode here: After the United States suddenly proposed to set up a new issue, the Chinese side proposed to the chairman of the conference that the United States did not provide complete materials in accordance with the rules of the discussion. It is recommended to take a 15 -minute rest in order to give the United States a chance to correct errors and supplement and perfect issues. China has not directly grasped the topic flaws to fight against the United States, which reflects the Chinese atmosphere and confidence.

After the United States made up the material materials, the Chinese side immediately became clear, and did not participate in the consultation of the issue, which effectively frustrated the plot of the "whitewashing" nuclear proliferation of the United States and Britain and Australia.

Why do you say that? The international atomic energy agency is based on the "non -diffusion nuclear weapon treaty". The main function is to prevent nuclear diffusion and promote peaceful use of nuclear energy. The agency currently has 175 member states, and all behaviors need to be authorized by member states.

Things such as the United States and Britain and Australia nuclear submarines must seek authorization from institutions. It is not possible to rely on institutional secretariat or chiefs. Only a member of a sovereign country has the final decision. Just as banks cannot handle black money by themselves, it does not have this law enforcement ability, and of course it cannot be "whitewashed" for the unknown black money. International Atomic Energy Agency (Picture Source: Foreign Media)

4. Xia Ke Island: In recent years, the United States has continued to promote miniaturization and actualization of nuclear weapons, and also exported nuclear technology and nuclear materials to India, Israel and other countries. The United Nations Five -core State previously issued a statement saying that "the nuclear war can't win or not be able to play". Why is the United States still play this dangerous game now?

Wang Qun: "The nuclear war can't be won or can't be played." This was first proposed by China. It can be said that China has played a strong leading role for the five -core country.

On the issue of nuclear, there are two recognized principles in the international community: one is the global strategic balance and stability, and the other is the general security of the world.

In terms of strategic balance and stability, the five -core country has already reached consensus. The two super -nuclear powers in the United States and Russia should take the lead in cutting nuclear weapons, effectively fulfilling special and priority responsibilities of nuclear disarmament. After cutting to a certain number, other nuclear weapons countries have joined the relevant process. However, the U.S. Russia negotiations are currently weak, and the United States has repeatedly spoken Chinese.

The world's general security means safety and inseparable. In recent years, the United States has continuously destroyed the contract and retired, and has withdrawn from major military control treaties such as the "Guide Treaty" and "Open Sky Treaty". The circle, especially the "AUKUS" agreement, involves nuclear diffusion, and pose a major threat to global universal security and regional security. In China, there are even countries in China that have begun to follow suit, which is very serious.

China calls on the agency to continue the process of discussing the intergovernmental discussion, especially through the form of permanent issues and special committees, and shall jointly discuss the solution of the cooperation between the Three Kingdoms nuclear submarines. At the same time, Australia must apply to the institutional secretariat in accordance with a comprehensive security supervision agreement in accordance with a comprehensive security agreement.

China also urged all parties to focus on the "original crime" and factual truth of the nuclear materials of the Three Kingdoms, and jointly defend the "Treaty of Non -Display Nuclear Weapons" with practical actions to maintain international peace and security.

Write/Diancang

Edit/波 波 波

- END -