American "guardrail": the harm of the global industrial chain

Author:Look at the think tank Time:2022.09.29

The United States' "Angle Act" has officially become legislation, and the terms of discriminatory electric vehicle subsidies have caused dissatisfaction. Related measures are based on the premise of providing subsidies such as local assembly in North America, forming discrimination against other imports of similar products, and suspected of violating the principles of the most beneficial benefits of the WTO and national treatment.

Members of WTO such as South Korea and the European Union expressed serious concerns or concerns about this. A spokesman for the Ministry of Commerce in my country also said that the United States, as a member of the WTO, should implement relevant investment policies in a manner in accordance with the rules of the WTO and maintain a trade order of fair competition. China will continue to track the follow -up implementation of US legislation, and will take measures to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests if necessary.

Why is the "Inflation Act" Is suspected of violating the principles of the WTO's most benefiting national treatment and national treatment? Can the bill really reduce American inflation? The reporter interviewed Wang Jiaqiang, a senior researcher at the Bank of China Research Institute, and Li Yan, an associate researcher at the American Research Institute of the Chinese Institute of Modern International Relations.

Text | Chai Yaxin China Discipline Inspection and Supervision Reporter

This article is reproduced from the WeChat public account "China Discipline Inspection and Supervision" (ID: zgjjjcb). The original first was released on September 27, 2022. The original title was "Deep Following the Witne of the Global Industrial Chain" Think tank viewpoint.

1

The bill is a cup of salary for lowering American inflation, and even in some ways.

Reporter: What is the background of the US "Inflation Act"?

Wang Jiaqiang: The Act Act of Aflation is a bill designed to suppress US inflation by reducing fiscal deficit, reducing consumption costs, and investing in new energy, involving energy security and climate change, medical health, tax reform and other fields. It is said that the bill is expected to increase the US $ 737 billion in fiscal revenue to the United States in the next 10 years, reducing the fiscal deficit of more than $ 300 billion.

The "Angle Act Act" is essentially the "Reduction Edition" of the "Reconstruction of the Better Future Act". Started the largest national public investment since the Great Depression of the 1930s. The initial scale of the plan was US $ 3.5 trillion. Due to the large differences between the two parties, it fell to about 2.2 trillion US dollars after many games, but it was still opposed by senators Manqin. Since then, after several months of negotiations and local adjustments, the scale has shrunk sharply. At the time of the high inflation of the United States, it was amended to the "Inflation Act".

At present, the support rate of Bayeng's government's public opinion is declining. At this time, the bill is introduced to win the support of the public's support for mid -term elections. The process of the bill is also worthy of fun. On August 7 this year, the Senate barely passed the bill with 51 votes. Democrats voted in favor of votes. Republicans voted against votes. Finally, a votes from Vice President Harris broke the deadlock. On August 12, the House of Representatives passed the bill with 220 votes to 207 votes, which still voted in favor of Democrats. Republicans voted against votes, which reflected the phenomenon of political polarization in the United States and the political dispute between the party's political disputes under the "American democracy". Efficacy.

Li Yan: The bill focuses on the climate change and the new energy industry. Among them, it is planned to invest 369 billion US dollars in the field of energy security and climate change. Judging from the main content of this bill, although the bill is called the "British Act", there are not many short -term effective practices that can directly inhibit the level of highly inflation in the United States. One of its main logic is to promote the transformation of US energy and reduce the US energy transformation and reduce The U.S. expenditure in the field of medical care reduces domestic energy prices in the United States, and controls the level of inflation in the middle and long term.

Reporter: Can the bill really reduce American inflation?

Wang Jiaqiang: Just as the voting process is so reluctant, the side reflects the name of the bill. In fact, the US high inflation has complicated causes: it has implemented super loose monetary policy and large -scale fiscal expenditure to cope with the epidemic and stimulate the economy; The global supply chain has increased production and consumption costs; the Ukrainian crisis has promoted the surge in global food and energy prices, and the inflation situation has further deteriorated; the green transition constraints in the context of climate change are large for the large carbon emissions country like the United States, and it has a larger result in a large country such as the United States. Inflation pressure.

To solve the problem of inflation, the law of supply and demand is inseparable. On the one hand, we must vigorously enhance the manufacturing capacity, reduce trade barriers, and improve the level of supply; on the other hand, we must vigorously reduce the excess demand brought by the Fed's over -currency issuance, residents' excessive liabilities, and government excessive expenses. From the specific content, the "Angle Act of Afnea" can be described as a lot of money for lowering American inflation, and in some ways, it is even opposite.

First, the bill will promote investment and consumer demand. Investment in the field of energy and climate will cause inflation pressure to promote demand, and it is mainly focused on the development of new energy sources and promoting green production. The elderly are more favorable, and the marginal consumption tendency of such people may increase inflation.

The second is to increase taxes on large enterprises for a long time. The bill sets a minimum tax rate of 15%of an annual revenue of more than $ 1 billion, which can tax more than $ 222 billion. The increasing tax burden on large enterprises will restrict investment and supply chain improvement to a certain extent; taxation will also affect long -term innovative investment and capital expenses, and offset the positive impact of green investment on supply growth. The US Taxation Foundation predicts that the bill will reduce the long -term output of the United States by about 0.1%and the loss of about 30,000 jobs. Third, the scale of fiscal deficit is not large. The US fiscal deficit of 2021 is as high as US $ 2.8 trillion, and the implementation of the bill is expected to reduce the fiscal deficit of about 30 billion US dollars, and this will be realized in the next 10 years, reducing about $ 30 billion in deficits each year, and the inflation effect is very limited. The US Congress Budget Office predicts that the fiscal deficit will reach US $ 14.5 trillion in the next ten years, and the deficit reduction in the bill will only be 2.1%. Moreover, whether the bill can cut deficit is still doubtful. The sharp interest rate hikes of the Federal Reserve are likely to lead to decline in the US economy in 2023, reduce fiscal revenue, and the scale of deficit will rise again.

2

The discrimination clause violates the principles of the WTO, and the United States uses industrial policies for its own interests to distort the global new energy market competition.

Reporter: How to view the discrimination clauses in the Afold Act? What are the relevant principles of the WTO?

Wang Jiaqiang: The principle of benefit country treatment is one of the most important and basic principles of the WTO. It is required to give one member to the other member's trade benefits and franchise. It must automatically give all other members. , That is, imported foreign goods or services should be at the principles of equal treatment with domestic products or services. The "purchasing American goods" regulations in the development of climate investment and support for new energy and new energy vehicles are discriminatory clauses, which obviously violates the principles of the WTO's most benefited national treatment and national treatment.

The "Angle Act" Act that the new energy and new energy vehicles are limited to the United States and countries that signed a free trade agreement with the United States and the United States. It is a typical discharge of him and discrimination, which violates the principles of the multilateral trade framework. For example, the bill proposes to provide a $ 4,000 tax credit to Americans who purchase second -hand electric vehicles, and to provide a new electric vehicle with $ 7,500 tax credits, but at least 40%of the car batteries have at least 40%of metal raw materials and minerals (such as, such as, for example Lithium and cobalt) must be used in the United States or signing a free trade agreement with the United States for mining and refining.

At present, China has strong competitiveness in many areas that respond to climate change. For example, China's new energy battery production capacity has occupied half of the world, and 15 of the top 20 companies in the world's power battery installed capacity are Chinese companies. In 2021, China's lithium battery export volume was US $ 28.4 billion, of which the United States was one of the most important export markets with an export value of about $ 5 billion. The bill clearly excludes new energy batteries and electric vehicles produced in China outside the supply chain, which is very obvious for its meaning. In this regard, the European Union, China, South Korea, etc. have expressed serious concerns, which is a natural and necessary attitude.

Li Yan: Similar to the "Chip and Science Act" passed by the United States before, there are also many "guardrail clauses" that advocate "manufacturing" in the "Inflation Act", which covers two levels: the first layer is for a specific country The guardrail, that is, the specific countries and their minerals and products designated by the US government cannot enjoy subsidies, which is obviously discriminatory for the Chinese industrial chain and weaken its cost advantage; the second floor is aimed at the so -called "friendly country", The United States can use this clause to negotiate with the allies. If these countries accept the corresponding requirements of the United States, the two parties reach a trade agreement in the new energy field, and they can also enjoy the corresponding subsidies and tax reductions in the United States.

The formation and development of the global industrial chain supply chain is the result of market laws and corporate selection. Both the chip industry and the new energy industry are highly global. The division of labor in various countries and jointly promoting the continuous and rapid progress of technology can help maintain the stability of the global industrial chain supply chain. The unfair trade barriers and "guardrails" are actually in order to use industrial policies to disturb the international market and global supply in order to disturb the international markets and make the global new energy industry from a relatively free and open development pattern. pattern. If this trend develops, it will further distort the global new energy market competition.

3

The bill of launching time, limited market scale, policy dividends or technical dividends are diluted. It is difficult for the new energy industry in the United States to take into account both "independence" and "autonomy".

Reporter: Some interpretation believes that the United States' "Angle Act of Inflation" shows that the intention of the new energy industry in the United States to realize "independence". How to view the goals and follow -up effects of the bill?

Li Yan: In recent years, the United States has become more and more strategic in the United States. There are two main factors: First, traditional energy is susceptible to international geopolitical influence, and supply and price fluctuations have been huge. Recently, energy prices have become an important factor Essence Second, new energy technology has matured, and economic benefits are more obvious, especially for new energy vehicles and photovoltaic technology progress. This makes the United States not only want to become a leading country in the world, but also to obtain generous benefits from new energy production capacity. However, the United States is trying to promote energy transformation through large -scale investment and tax structural tilt to achieve the "independence" of the new energy industry, but still faces four prominent problems: First, the launch of the bill is too late, and the gold window has been missed. The policy incentive is difficult It plays a decisive effect; the second is that the market size of the bill is limited and it is difficult to shake the global new energy industry pattern; the third is that the policy dividend provided by the bill may be diluted by the technical dividend. Even considering the subsidy factors, some of the more advanced new energy products in other countries will still be competitive in the US market; the fourth is that the "independence" and "autonomy" pursued by the bill have inherent contradictions and difficult to take into account. "Independence" is mainly aimed at production capacity, which is more likely to be realized through industrial introduction. "Autonomy" is mainly for technology, and it needs long -term accumulation and continuous research and development. The bill focuses more on the former from the coverage time period and the area of ​​incentives, that is, to drive the expansion of new energy in the United States in the short term. Foreign enterprises with mature technology, industrial chain and market distribution will be easier to benefit from it, thereby consolidating its leading position. In the long run, whether the United States can create a technical advantage during the policy incentive period, there is still greater questions.

4

With the banner of "cutting inflation", the United States destroys the trade order of fair competition, and damages the global industrial chain supply chain structure and economic globalization process.

Reporter: How do you think of the spilled effect of the "British Act"? What impact will it have on the global new energy industry?

Wang Jiaqiang: The "Angle Act Act" has taken effect, and it is difficult to change due to the opposition from other countries. In the future, related countries can file a dispute lawsuit through the multilateral framework of the WTO; in the principle of peering, we can take corresponding protection measures for the interests of domestic enterprises or take revenge on the US approach. Global new energy and related industries will undoubtedly usher in new competition.

In the short term, the bill is still difficult to shake the global new energy industry pattern. The implementation of the bill may stimulate the development of related industries in the United States, which has led to a slowdown in the import of imports of related products in China. However, from the market, the global new energy transformation investment in 2021 exceeded 750 billion US dollars, and China accounted for about 35%. It is difficult to completely get rid of the supply chain to the Chinese market in the short term, especially new energy production requires a large number of key minerals, such as cobalt, nickel, lithium, etc. China has a leading advantage in refining these minerals; more than, the production cost of the United States is still very good It is difficult to catch up with China, the size of the new energy vehicle market is still not large. In the short term, it will only cause American consumers to be restricted, increased consumer costs, and consumer surplus damage.

In the long run, with the "Angle Act of Inflation" as an introduction, countries will pay more attention to the security of the new energy industry and the stability of the supply chain. The industrial layout has brought new influences, and market competition has become more intense. Only by leading costs, technology -leading and market -leading countries will they win in the long run.

5

China must adhere to the established development path and development strategy, enhance the independent and controllable capabilities of advanced industry chains such as chips and new energy, and lay a solid foundation for the competition of the industrial chain.

Reporter: In important areas such as chips and new energy, the United States has frequently launched an industrial support bill to make articles on the industrial chain supply chain to curb the reality of competition. How should China actively respond and seek development?

Li Yan: Since the Bayeng government came to power, it has promoted the introduction of the "Infrastructure Act", "Chip and Science Act" and "Inflation Act". These three bills use China as the main opponent to curb the suppression to a certain extent.

In the face of this situation, we must adhere to the established development path and development strategy, and put more response to specific fields such as improving the toughness, international competitiveness, and international attraction of my country's science and technology system. In particular, we attach great importance to the implementation of the strategy of self -reliance and self -reliance. In the next -generation semiconductor and quantum computing, such as subversive fields, we must do a good job of pre -layout and technical accumulation to create future international competitiveness.

We must pay attention to cultivating the international cooperation network. As far as the new energy overseas market is concerned, the "guardrail" of the United States has also closed its own new energy market to a certain extent, but in fact, the global new energy market is still very large. These incremental markets are the focus of future competition. We must make good use of the first advantage.

Wang Jiaqiang: Regarding the situation of the US's industrial policy in important areas such as chips and clean energy, we must pay attention to strategic and tacticals based on its own market competitive position based on its own market competition position.

Do a good job of protecting and stable prices for key products, and actively enhance the competitiveness of the industrial chain and development toughness.

Further strengthen the support for hard technology and basic research, and support the development of related industries. For "shortcomings" in the fields of basic technology, key equipment, "stuck neck" links, enhance the autonomous and controllable capabilities of advanced industrial chains and other advanced industrial chains. Increase the technological upgrading and transformation of traditional industries, and improve the digitalization, intelligence and green level of the traditional industry chain. Accelerate the development of clean energy fields and enhance energy safety guarantee capabilities. With the rise of the green economy and the deepenation of the global geopolitical pattern, energy problems have become global and strategic issues involving industrial security and national interests. As a large manufacturing country and a large energy consumer country, China should continue to promote the development of clean energy and maintain the competitiveness of energy security and industrial chain. Accelerate the industrialization of clean energy technology, vigorously support the development of the upstream and downstream industrial chain of clean energy, create the advantages of the entire industry chain, and enhance the international competitiveness of the clean energy industry.

Uncle Ku Welfare

Uncle Ku's book is always there! In the Huajing Times, Uncle Ku provided 15 "New Era of the Party's Leadership and the Party's Construction Series Textbooks" presented to enthusiastic readers. This set of books was edited by the Party Construction Teaching and Research Department of the Party School of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (National Academy of Administration). It is the results of party building teaching and research on all teachers of the Party Construction Department for many years. Please comment under the article that the top 3 (more than 50) who likes the highest likes will get a book.

- END -

Sudden!Near the U.S. Tower, a man committed suicide after driving through the card

On August 14, local time, the U.S. Police confirmed that a man drove to the road b...

Gutres: It should be ensured that Russian food fertilizers are not hindered to enter the global market

Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, August 21st, the mayor of Sevastopol City, Razwazayev, said on the 20th that the Russian Black Sea Fleet headquarters was attacked by drones on the same day. UN Secretary