The trial of the innovation trial management model of Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court ranked in the province's first part of the province

"This model is really too efficient!" Lawyer Liu who had just started the court emotion after hearing the investigation of the case of the Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court. On September 7, the reporter learned from the Taiyuan Intermediate Court that with the "two levels of the Taiyuan Court, The three reviews and interaction laws, referee documents, cases, and trials have continued to carry out consecutive competitions, which has led to the city's court's innovative trial management model, and the trial quality and efficiency ranks first in the province.

Cure "disease"

The judge was tired of handling the case, the evaluation and investigation were step by step, and the quality and efficiency were not satisfactory ... As the provincial capital courts that exceeded 100,000 pieces of annual cases, facing the statistical data and review conclusions in front of them, the party group of Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court formulated the "case "Supervision and Management Measures" uses key case supervision and evaluation as the core of the trial management, accurately grasp the management goals, and directly strike the key to the quality and efficiency of the trial.

At the same time, the Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court innovated the "two -level and three evaluation interaction laws" for review. The "two levels" refer to the grassroots courts and the middle court, the "three evaluations" are the three steps of the judge's self -assessment, the initial evaluation of the grassroots court audit committee, and the final evaluation of the intermediate court audit committee. Mutual evaluation runs through it. Through the design of a complete and strict evaluation process, the function of the case quality evaluation was expanded to the two -level courts, forming a management pattern responsible for the quality and efficiency office, judge, and president of the board, and coordinated and coordinated. The diversification of the management subject and the interaction of management methods have also allowed the protagonist of the protagonist of the trial to passively cope with the active participation, which is not only conducive to strengthening the scientific and precision of trial management decision -making, but also to promote the self -management of judges. The first instance judge had objections to the second instance, and he could submit opinions step by step or even enter the Intermediate Court Audit Committee to communicate face -to -face with the second instance judge. This is also a useful attempt by Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court in the current trial supervision system.

Face -to -face saying

In early September, the Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court held the final evaluation of the Intermediate People's Court of the Intermediate Court of the Intermediate Court of the Intermediate People's Court in the case of the case of the reform and reform in 2021, and the one -on -one debate scene was staged again. Which one is closer to the truth and more in line with fairness and justice, see the true chapter at the review. After listening to the opinions of the judges of the first and second trials and fully discussed, the members of the trial committee were qualitatively expressed one by one.

The first case of the discussion was hosted by Judge Ning of Xinghualing Court. Although the trial committee finally recognized the conclusion of the second instance, Judge Ning had a sense of enlightenment. He said: "When the members summarized the cases of evidence and the key points of the facts of the facts, the members of the members had a deeper understanding of the concept of responsibility for the first trial and the second trial of the second instance."

Since the beginning of this year, considering the multi -tasking and other factors of the first instance, the Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court has further optimized the system, and the final evaluation will be opened to the grass -roots court to exchange opinions with the first instance judges. After the evaluation, it can achieve an consistent clarification of responsibilities. The fault is in the first instance. The fault was in the second trial.

Reverse supervision is effective

Let the first instance objection to the second instance, and the second instance judge took the initiative to sink to the court of first instance to explain the reason for the development and reform. Will this practice make the second instance judge have no face? Fan Hongfeng, director of the quality and efficiency office of Taiyuan Central Court, gave an interpretation: "Cases that have objections to the first instance judges conduct business discussions as a sample, deepen the understanding of facts and applications in the discussion. Avoid wrong and wrong, and stimulate positive effectiveness with reverse supervision. "

In the first half of this year, Taiyuan Intermediate People's Court applied for retrial rate by 5.2%compared with the same period last year. The re -review rate of effective cases fell from 0.14%in the same period last year to 0.018%, and the judgment rate increased by 7 percentage points.

Persist in craftsmanship

"I am convinced that my judgment is right." The second trial of the Judge of Minyi court was supported by the members. "The judge must have the spirit of craftsmen, understand the case review, judge clearly, write the text clearly, and explain to the parties and the public that it is the craftsmanship of our judge for a lifetime. They must be professional and rigorous, be able to withstand the internal inspection of the court, and stand the evaluation of the parties. "

Interaction is not limited to the evaluation meeting, it has expanded into a bridge for communication between the two courts. From daily guidance to judgment, from the supervision of squatting to the rearrassment, the two courts of the city's two levels in the city have a total of chess, sinking into the quality of the quality. With the implementation of the "two -level and three evaluations and interaction laws", referee documents, cases, and court reviews continuously carried out in succession. In the past two years, more than 30 typical cases were created. Realm and judicial capabilities are continuously improved. Source: Taiyuan Daily Author: Chen Shan correspondent Bai Jie

- END -