Fake production and sale of safety production certificates and safety production training "walking" in Jiangsu was exposed

The reporter learned from the Jiangsu Provincial Department of Emergency Management on June 20 that since October 2021, the province's emergency management system in Jiangsu has solidly launched special actions for special operations and production safety training for counterfeiting government websites and "walking". Strictly implement the "three strikes, one investigation and punishment", resolutely investigate and deal with a group of fake personnel and fake enterprises, investigate and deal with a group of production and operation units that do not implement the training system, expose a group of typical cases of violations of laws and regulations, further standardize the training market order, prevent and prevent and and prevent and prevent and and prevent it. Reduce production safety accidents and ensure the safety of the people's lives and property.

The province's safety production training "walking" special rectification and cracking down on fake certificates for a typical case-

Case One Nanjing City

On January 7, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Nanjing Gulou District Emergency Administration of Gulou District found law enforcement inspections on Jiangsu Medical Device Co., Ltd. and found that the company's warehousing site had no personnel safety management system and failed to provide safety training related information. After investigation, Gu Mouhe, the company's main person in charge, existed illegal acts of "not establishing improvement and implementation of all the unit's safety production responsibility system; unorganized and implementing the unit's safety production education and training plan".

The behavior violated Article 21 (1) and (1) of Article 21 (1) and (3) of the "People's Republic of China". The provisions of Article 4, combined with the "Detailed Rules for the Application of the Free Tailoring of the Administrative Punishment of Jiangsu Province", ordered Gu Mouhe, the company's main person in charge to make corrections within a time limit, and made a decision to fires a fine of 20,000 yuan.

Case two Wuxi City

On February 23, 2022, during the law enforcement personnel of Yueyin Town, Jiangyin City, Wuxi City conducted law enforcement inspections on Wuxi Shangjiang Purification Equipment Co., Ltd., they found that the unit did not conduct safety production education and training for employees in accordance with regulations; The issue of risk recognition control system.

The behavior violated Article 28 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China" and Article 7 of the "Regulations on the Regulations on the Institute of Safety Production Risk Report" in Jiangsu Province, and the people's government of Yueyue City, Jiangyin City, Article 97 (3) of the Production Law and the provisions of Article 34 (1) of Article 34 (1) of the Jiangsu Provincial Industrial Enterprise Safety Production Risk Report and combined with free tailoring, a fine of RMB 10.375 million in the company Yuan's administrative penalty decision.

Case Sanxuzhou City

On January 13, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Fengxian Emergency Management Bureau of Xuzhou City conducted law enforcement inspections on Xuzhou Happiness Home Electric Motoring Co., Ltd., and found that Li Mouhe, Wang Mou Ling, and Liu Mou Road (welders) were not Welding and thermal cutting special operation permits were obtained for on -site welding operations; the company did not establish and improve the training files of special operators such as Li Mougang, Shi Mou, and Sun Mouyan. Law enforcement officers immediately ordered to stop welding operations, issued the "Instructions for Elimination Details", and conducted investigation on the same day.

The act violated Article 30 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China" and Article 34 of the "Regulations on the Management of Safety Technology Training and Evaluation of Special Operators", in accordance with the "People's Republic of China Article 97 (7) of Article 97 (7) and Article 38 of the "Special Operators Safety Technology Training Evaluation Management Regulations" shall impose a decision of administrative penalties of RMB 10.175 million in the company.

Case Four Changzhou City

On February 15, 2022, law enforcement officers of the Changzhou Wujin District Emergency Administration found that a welder without welding and thermal cutting special operation permit for Changzhou Hengdun Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. The hot -cut special operation permit is illegal to participate in the review on schedule.

The behavior violated Article 30 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", paragraph 3, paragraph 1, and the Emergency Administration Bureau of the Changzhou Wusheng District in accordance with the provisions of Article 97 (7) of the People's Republic of China The company's administrative penalty decision was imposed by the company.

Case Five Suzhou City

On January 4, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Suzhou Changshu City Emergency Management Bureau conducted a safety production law enforcement inspection on Suzhou Precision Industrial Products Co., Ltd., and found that the unit had not conducted safety production education and training for the dispatched workers in accordance with regulations in accordance with regulations. ; Special operators have not trained in accordance with the specified safety operations and obtained corresponding qualifications.

The behavior violated the provisions of Article 28, paragraph 2 and Article 30, paragraph and Article 30 of the People's Republic of China. According to the provisions of Article 97 (3) and (seven) of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China" and combined with free tailoring in accordance with the "Safety Production Law" and combined with free tailoring, the unit was ordered to make corrections within a time limit and made a fine of RMB 36,000 Administrative penalty decision.

Case Liu Nantong City

From March 23-24, 2022, law enforcement officers of Nantong Emergency Administration conducted law enforcement inspections on Jiangsu Chuandao Washing Machinery Technology Co., Ltd. and found that the company's employee Jiang Mouyan conducted a fake electrical special operation operation certificate; Tang Mouhua The electrician special operational operation permit was not reviewed, and the electricity work industry was still engaged in the inspection; Xue Mouyong's third -level education and training was less than 24 hours.

This behavior violates Article 30, paragraph 1 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", Article 36, paragraph 1 of the "Safety Technology Training and Evaluation Management Regulations of Special Operators" Articles and Article 13, paragraph 1) of the "Regulations on the Safety Training Regulations of Production and Operation Units", in accordance with Article 97 (7) of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", and "Special Operator Safety Technology Training and Management Regulations "Article 40 and the" Administrative Measures for Safety Production Training "Article 36 (1) shall be warned and fined the company's administrative penalty decision of RMB 36,200. The company's employee Jiang Mouyan's behavior violates the provisions of Article 36, paragraph 2 of the Special Operators Safety Technology Training Evaluation Management Regulations, and in accordance with Article 41 of the "Special Operators Safety Technology Training Evaluation Management Regulations" One provision gave Jiang Mouyan a warning and fined the administrative penalty decision of RMB 4,000.

Case Seven Lianyungang City

On May 13, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Lianyungang Municipal Emergency Administration held a supervision and inspection of Lianyungang Shengyu New Building Materials Co., Ltd., and found that the company's two special operators did not obtain a special operational operation certificate in accordance with regulations.

The behavior violates Article 30 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", paragraph 1, paragraph, and the Lianyungang Municipal Emergency Administration in accordance with the provisions of Article 97 (7) of the "People's Republic of China" and Tailors made the company's administrative penalty decision with a fine of 30,000 yuan.

Case Eight Huai'an City

On March 21, 2022, when the Huai'an Industrial Park Safety Supervision Bureau inspected Jiangsu Hisense Pharmaceutical and Chemical Co., Ltd., it was found that the company's employees Yang Moumin and Xu Mouhua did not obtain the illegal law of the special operation certificate of the dangerous chemical amine. Behavior.

The behavior violated Article 30 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", paragraph 1, paragraph 1, and, in accordance with the provisions of Article 97 (7) of the "People's Republic of China" and Combined with the free tailoring, the enterprise made a penalty of RMB 60,000 for administrative penalties.

Case Jiuyan City

On March 11, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Safety Supervision Bureau of Huangsha Port Town, Yanyang County, Yanyang City conducted a safety law enforcement inspection on the long -term repairs of Huangsha Port Town, Sheyang County. Welding and thermal cutting special operation permits were welded in the unit of the unit, and law enforcement officers immediately ordered Hou Moushun and Xue Moulin to stop welding operations.

The behavior violated Article 30, paragraph 1, paragraph 1, paragraph 1 of the "People's Republic of China". The item stipulates that the unit imposed a penalty of 38,000 yuan in administrative penalties.

Case ten Yangzhou City

On March 14, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Yizheng City Emergency Administration of Yangzhou City conducted a "four nominated" law enforcement inspections on Jiangsu Xiangbei Machinery Technology Co., Ltd., and found that the company's main person in charge did not organize and implement the unit's safety production. Education and training plan.

The behavior violated Article 21 (3) of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", and the Yizheng Municipal Emergency Administration Bureau shall be Combined with the free tailoring, the company's main person in charge made a fine of RMB 2.225 million in administrative penalties.

Case 11 Zhenjiang City

On April 27, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Yangzhong City Emergency Administration of Zhenjiang City conducted law enforcement inspections on Jiangsu Qianyuan Feida Electric Equipment Co., Ltd. Special training obtained a special operational operation certificate for employment operations; no work safety education and training were conducted in the assembly Gong.

The act violated Article 30 and 28 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", in accordance with the provisions of Article 97, paragraph 3 and 7 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China" The administrative penalty decision with a fine of 12,000 yuan was made.

Case Twelve Taizhou City

On March 17, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Jingjiang Emergency Administration of Taizhou City, while conducting a "walking" law enforcement inspection on a work safety training company in Jingjiang City, found that the company's special homework apprentice worker went to work alone for welding operations. Seeing others instructing his homework, the employee did not obtain a special operation certificate for melting welding and thermal cutting.

The act violated Article 30, paragraph 1, paragraph 1 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", and made a fine of RMB 1.2 in accordance with the provisions of Article 97 (7) of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China" 10,000 yuan administrative penalty decision.

Case 13 Suqian City

On February 7, 2022, the law enforcement officer of the Emergency Administration of Liyang County in Suqian City conducted law enforcement inspections on Jiangsu Qianzhen Fashion Co., Ltd., and found that the company had not conducted safety production education and training for employees in accordance with regulations.

The behavior violated the provisions of paragraph 28 of the "Safety Production Law of the People's Republic of China", and the Puyang County Emergency Administration was combined in accordance with the provisions of Article 97 (3) of the People's Republic of China. Free tailoring, a decision on administrative penalties of RMB 15,000 for the company.

Source Jiangsu Province Emergency Management Department

- END -