Hot Comment 丨 Cut Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Mo Missed the Reform of the "Farmers Participation in the Provident Fund"

Zhejiang News Client commentator Zhang Ping

Picture according to visual China

Recently, Longgang City, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, incorporated the peasant group into the pilot pilot of the housing provident fund reform, and continued to ferment on the public opinion field, which has aroused a lot of attention. Some media and netizens interpret policies from the perspective of open source for housing provident fund funds and real estate destocking, and even linked with them with "buying houses in the city, driving to plant land" There is a possibility of misunderstanding.

Those who are familiar with the history of Longgang know that reforms are genes flowing in the blood of Longgang. The "National First Farmer City" developed from five small fishing villages has opened a precedent for many times in history. The implementation of rural land and household registration reforms are allowed to be used for paid use of land. Farmers are allowed to leave the country and leave the countryside, boldly explore the path of rural urbanization, and become the first "town reform city" in the country. The establishment of a housing provident fund system for collective economic organizations also belongs to such a national innovation.

From the explanation of the local government, the original intention of the establishment of the housing provident fund system of collective economic organizations was to solve the problem of difficulty in housing financing and financing of some urban and rural "sandwich groups". It cannot be simply understood that farmers have since reference to urban employees to participate in the provident fund. There is a key difference between the two: the "farmers" of Longgang in the general sense. On April 26, 2020, with the comprehensive completion of the "village reform community" of Longgang City, Longgang has no rural village committee and 210,000 villagers become citizens. Correspondingly, the "farmers" who meet the provident fund deposit conditions are no longer a traditional farmer in their identity. To be precise, they are more than 3,200 "houses without households" among members of the collective economic organization. The provident fund loan is mainly used to cover the capital gap of farmers' purchase and construction houses. The policy support of this system is actually the housing provident fund system of flexible employment staff in Wenzhou.

Therefore, the innovative system of Longgang is aimed at the specific problems of the local area. It responded to the local people's livelihood expectations. After a series of early reforms, it echoed the theme of Zhejiang to promote common prosperity. Significance requires cautious and scientific arguments.

Putting such a new policy of such a special city in the background of the country is particularly to prevent Wangwen Shengyi and simple benchmarking. For another example, since this year, policies have been introduced in many places across the country to support and encourage farmers to enter the city to buy houses, and some real estate even launched the promotion of crops to the house. Taking farmers as the target of real estate destocking, driving local consumption or reserving people with houses has its real logic. However, Longgang's New Deal is obviously nothing to do with it. The staff of the local agricultural and rural areas directly responded to "can't set up." They mainly point to the right to qualifications of the homestead, providing financial support for the construction of a house or the improvement of the old building and new. As for the tension of the funding pool of the provident fund, it was further pulled. First of all, the total amount of people in line with policies is not large; second, the local finance will pay 25%of the monthly payment amount of personal monthly deposits, which is realized out.

Of course, whether it is a housing security system for collective economic organizations that establish urban and rural areas, expand the coverage of the housing provident fund system, or alleviate the liquidity of housing provident funds in some regions, or the issue of real estate destocking, or other issues of farmers' rights and interests, all of which are all issues. It is a very valuable issue across the country. It is necessary to support the reform of "long -term" to continue to explore deeply. Discuss the difficulty of these difficulties in public areas. However, the premise must be based on the facts of the facts and the policy of the policy, and cannot break the righteousness, go to the end, and use the wine glasses of others to pour their own blocks. In this way, it not only destroys the public opinion environment of local reforms, but also causes real issues to lose focus and fall into the "language mud" that speaks.

- END -